Jodi has filed a PCR. She skirted by the submittal time frame which is 90 days after an appeal is ruled on. She did so by using sections of rule 32 which allows late submittals if new evidence is to be submitted.
What "new" evidence?
Jodi has filed a PCR. She skirted by the submittal time frame which is 90 days after an appeal is ruled on. She did so by using sections of rule 32 which allows late submittals if new evidence is to be submitted.
New evidWhat "new" evidence?
Post-conviction relief:
The PCR itself hasn't been submitted yet. Just the notification and the ruling that it can be submitted late using updates to rule 32 that now allow it. All of the current documents are on the AZ courts website. There is another document that seems to indicate that Jodi is dropping the suit against Nurmi. And another elate to Juan asking for a transcript for some reason.@Midnight Rambler - I thought you were going to tell us - "what" her "new" evidence is??!!
The PCR itself hasn't been submitted yet. Just the notification and the ruling that it can be submitted late using updates to rule 32 that now allow it. All of the current documents are on the AZ courts website. There is another document that seems to indicate that Jodi is dropping the suit against Nurmi. And another elate to Juan asking for a transcript for some reason.
Ah - I see! Do you happen to have a link the AZ court site - to see if I can access it?
TIA!
If you're interested in a Facebook group that has an extensive file collection related to the appeal etc I will give you the name of the grpouand you can join.Ah - I see! Do you happen to have a link the AZ court site - to see if I can access it?
TIA!
You will need the case numbers. I'll get them for you.okay - I can access this - but which one do I choose?
I tried Criminal & civil cases - but nothing came up with her name.... sorry to bother you!
(PCR Rule 32 info CR2008-031021-oo1DT 2-26-21 & 8-29-19) ( Arias vs Nurmi 2017-014091 (2-11-21)okay - I can access this - but which one do I choose?
I tried Criminal & civil cases - but nothing came up with her name.... sorry to bother you!
There should be two listings for Arias vs Martinez also under number CR2008-031021-001-DT one dated 6-15-20 & 8-29-19okay - I can access this - but which one do I choose?
I tried Criminal & civil cases - but nothing came up with her name.... sorry to bother you!
There should be two listings for Arias vs Martinez also under number CR2008-031021-001-DT one dated 6-15-20 & 8-29-19
Thank you for all that! I got in & found them.
The PCR can be filed for reasons other than new evidence....I've retired from actively looking up info on this case, any which way & from anywhere. Hopefully one of you (or someone else) will post about whatever "new" evidence she claims exists (hearty lol's on that).
And, she dropped the civil case against Nurmi? Lol on that too. First- she didn't have an actual case against him (to claw back his fictional earnings from that self published mess of an alleged book). Second- lawsuits cost money, and I imagine she's hoarding most of what's left of her fan club funds to spend on zit cream, anchovies & the like over the next 5 or so decades she'll spend in prison before dying there.
What is the implication of this? And what is a PCR?Jodi has filed a PCR. She skirted by the submittal time frame which is 90 days after an appeal is ruled on. She did so by using sections of rule 32 which allows late submittals if new evidence is to be submitted.
Is this the stage which goes before Judge Stephens? Good luck with that!The PCR can be filed for reasons other than new evidence....
PCR:
Legal grounds to file a PCR include the following:
(A) There is new evidence that has been discovered that either exists or probably exists and if the evidence was known at the time of the trial it probably would have changed the verdict or sentence. (ie: newly run DNA, a new witness comes forward.)
(B) The sentence imposed exceeds the maximum allowed by law.
(C) The person has been held in custody (usually prison) after the sentence was set to expire.
(D) The defendant failed to appeal but it was not their fault (ie: no access to records in prison).
(E) There has been a change of law since the defendant’s conviction that would probably overturn the defendant’s conviction or sentence had it been tried after the inception of the new law.
(F) Ineffective assistance of counsel where the defense attorney did such a poor job in preparing the defense or a poor job at trial that but for the attorney’s poor efforts the defendant would not have been convicted.
(G) Prosecutorial misconduct: The prosecutor violated the rules to the point where the conviction was would not have occurred but for their actions.
(H) The court did not have the jurisdiction to sentence the defendant.
(I) The conviction violates a term(s) of the United States Constitution or Arizona State Constitution.
Normally Stephens would hear the PCR unless she is busy with another trial or some other reason. The reason being is that she would be most familiar with what transpired during the trial and whatever issues are being raised.Is this the stage which goes before Judge Stephens? Good luck with that!
One of the implications is that Jodi could possibly be awarded a new trial if an infraction is serious enough to warrant it. It has been done before.What is the implication of this? And what is a PCR?