PrincessSezMe
Rest in Peace
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2012
- Messages
- 2,112
- Reaction score
- 2
I can't get into this site either http://www.azcentral.com/community/m...nclick_check=1
Could someone give me a little synopsis of what it is about. Something about more reports of animal abuse by CMJA??? Sorry can't seem to follow what's going on. :blushing:
Thanks ...... Would like to hear more about this :seeya:
http://www.azcentral.com/community/...-arias-sidebars-exclusive.html?nclick_check=1
Hi Sydni :seeya: I transcribed them for those that can't play them. Here's the first two. I'll have the second two posted shortly. Mods if these belong somewhere else please move thanks.
Clip One:
JM: 558 talks about torturing pets. The defendant tortured her cat…and I want to get into that…and it’s in her notes….and it’s something that she knows about. My argument’s going to be that if anyone’s the abuse, if anyone’s the abuser it’s her, and that’s where I’m headed.
JSS: However, Mr. Martinez I, I did read the note that says that she poked at the cat and she slapped the dog…but I don’t know that that rises to the level of torturing a pet, which is what is listed on the….under terrorism. It says torturing pets.
JM: But she also squeezed the cat out of anger. Um she also squeezed the cat very tight, too tight, out of anger….
(The judge ruled it out).
Clip Two:
(This one deals with the dismissal of juror #8)
JM: If I could just have his name.
JSS: Yes
JM: Okay
JSS: I’ll find out.
JW: And judge, just to make sure that I think that juror #8 should have no knowledge that the prosecutor is investigating him.
JSS: I agree. I think that’s one of the reasons I’m uncomfortable about asking him for the number. I think as far as he’s concerned it’s done. I don’t want him to think we are concerned about him beyond what we’ve already discussed. OK, alright.
(this is news because everyone thought the DT fought to get juror #8 off the jury, but it was actually the prosecution that had him investigated and removed apparently)