This is a worthwhile consideration IMO. Travis made it clear that he ended the relationship. Inmate Arias disregarded what Travis wanted. She imposed her own reality on him and continued to pursue him against his will manipulating him with her sexual availability. Sex was offered him, he took it, but did not want to continue.Did JM concede that they had consensual sex on the day Travis was murdered?
Covertly, she travelled over 1000 miles to Mesa. She arrived at his house at 4.00am in the morning, carrying tools for murder. Most people were asleep in their beds. She got into Travis's house. Again this was against his will. He was her victim. It seems she seduced him with her sexual availability. If she was the sexual aggressor, it could be considered rape IMO. After her sexual adventures, in which he was her object, then she brutally murdered him. In my humble opinion, this seems sociopathic in nature and has similarities with other sociopathic murderers who combine sexuality with murder. It is about having the ultimate power over another. Inmate Arias imposed her reality on him. e.g: her being in his house uninvited many times against his will; her intrusions into his email accounts & private property against his will; her sexual manipulation against his will. He was her victim once the continued pursuit happened against his will. Her relentless pursuit and disregard for his wishes made him feel unsafe IMHO. It was Travis who felt anxious, trapped, frustrated and helpless before sending that rejecting email. He was already her victim and her plan was already forming IMHO. He felt unsafe with inmate Arias and stated to friends something like "don't be surprised if you find me dead one day". He sensed he was in danger, but being male and strong, he has underestimated her. We need to be thankful that the Jury got it right when they convicted inmate Arias for Murder 1. This real life scenario has similarities with the move Fatal Attraction and Play Misty For Me.