Surfside
Court's Indulgence
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2014
- Messages
- 2,530
- Reaction score
- 17,108
All due respect, but at least 10 of those jurors found the presented evidence to be enough. One holdout, who was friends with the defense attorney, swayed another juror in his favor. I just don't agree that "some of the jury didn't find . . . [the] evidence compelling enough to convict and it resulted in a mistrial." I don't think that's how the mistrial came to be AT ALL. JMO, of course.The phone records were presented in the case, so the jury had that evidence available to them. Some on the jury didn't find the phone records, along with a lot of other evidence, compelling enough to convict and it resulted in a mistrial. If some forensic evidence existed in the car, no one will ever know. It was never able to be presented because the car was not allowed to be processed at the police facility. I wonder if some jurors didn't have the same question.