Simple question...

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

Same writer?

  • Yes

    Votes: 111 81.6%

  • No

    Votes: 25 18.4%
  • Total voters
    136

New Posts

txsvicki said:
What a long thread and no longer discussing the letter e in the ransom note, but I am wondering if John was correct about an insider. Could someone who knew Patsy's handwriting very well have been practicing to write like her to write hot checks, but decided against it. When writing the crazy ransom note and trying to disguise handwriting, it could be possible to actually make some of the letters like Patsy's. I know I'll probably be laughed out of the JonBenet section, lol, but that's okay because I know there's no way I could match wits with anyone or have as much knowledge about the case. The person also knew the bonus amount and had bitterness about "fat cats". Jealousy over their money.
Click to expand...

There is someone who potentially fits all the criteria you have said and then some. But we've got nothing on her. No match to DNA, handwriting, hair, or anything else. But IS there something that's yet to be discovered that could solve this??
 
txsvicki said:
What a long thread and no longer discussing the letter e in the ransom note, but I am wondering if John was correct about an insider. Could someone who knew Patsy's handwriting very well have been practicing to write like her to write hot checks, but decided against it. When writing the crazy ransom note and trying to disguise handwriting, it could be possible to actually make some of the letters like Patsy's. I know I'll probably be laughed out of the JonBenet section, lol, but that's okay because I know there's no way I could match wits with anyone or have as much knowledge about the case. The person also knew the bonus amount and had bitterness about "fat cats". Jealousy over their money.
Click to expand...

You're not the first person to bring that up, txsvicki. But they'd have to have been the end-all, be-all of forgers.
 
txsvicki said:
What a long thread and no longer discussing the letter e in the ransom note, but I am wondering if John was correct about an insider. Could someone who knew Patsy's handwriting very well have been practicing to write like her to write hot checks, but decided against it. When writing the crazy ransom note and trying to disguise handwriting, it could be possible to actually make some of the letters like Patsy's. I know I'll probably be laughed out of the JonBenet section, lol, but that's okay because I know there's no way I could match wits with anyone or have as much knowledge about the case. The person also knew the bonus amount and had bitterness about "fat cats". Jealousy over their money.
Click to expand...
I'm not laughing. This is what I've thought IF it was an intruder and because of the R's lies it is hard to fathom but IF it was...I think it was someone who practiced long and hard to mimi PR's writing, style, and idioms. I think that person would have been a woman who was jealous of PR and JB's beauty and the R's success and might have secretly been in love with JR.
 
Steely said:
I'm not laughing. This is what I've thought IF it was an intruder and because of the R's lies it is hard to fathom but IF it was...I think it was someone who practiced long and hard to mimi PR's writing, style, and idioms. I think that person would have been a woman who was jealous of PR and JB's beauty and the R's success and might have secretly been in love with JR.
Click to expand...

This is the only scenario in which I could believe IDI. But here's the thing, all the lies from the Ramseys, those cannot be explained away by any intruder theory. I've tried many, many hours to think of an explanation for their behavior if an intruder really did it and I can't come up with one single answer. Has anyone here ever been able to come up with a reason for their lies?
 
joeskidbeck said:
This is the only scenario in which I could believe IDI. But here's the thing, all the lies from the Ramseys, those cannot be explained away by any intruder theory. I've tried many, many hours to think of an explanation for their behavior if an intruder really did it and I can't come up with one single answer. Has anyone here ever been able to come up with a reason for their lies?
Click to expand...

There were no lies.
 
It was all one big lie they told and kept right on telling to this day.... Lies lies lies!
 
SuperDave said:
My eyesight's not THAT bad, Murri. I read it the first time. I simply could not believe that anyone could say that with a straight face.
Click to expand...

Well, if they didn't have anything to do with their daughter's murder, then they had no reason to lie. Very simple. RDI (they lied), IDI (no lies).
 
SunnieRN said:
Same WIKI quote back at 'cha MF. The lies are all documented, beginning with the 911 call. In fact, they are too numerous to name.
Click to expand...

Nope, sorry there is nothing on the 911 call except a desperate mother whose child is missing and who has found a RN that says she's been kidnapped.
 
SuperDave said:
My point exactly!
Click to expand...

Oh boy, is this AGREEMENT?? I can hardly believe it's possible.

RDI = they lied

IDI = they didn't lie

Are you sure you understand that if an intruder killed JBR then no-one in the R family told a deliberate untruth about anything??

This is my opinion.

Is this worthy of some kind of acknowledgement that there is another line of thought other than yours?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

DNASolves

Who is Fairfield County Jane Doe (1993)?

Members online

... and 130 more.
Total: 417 (members: 131, guests: 286)

Online statistics

Members online
131
Guests online
286
Total visitors
417
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
606,067
Messages
18,197,668
Members
233,719
Latest member
Clm79
Back
Top