The State has asked for a life sentence.
The Defence has argued that substantial and compelling circumstances justify a sentence less than 15 years and that a term of imprisonment of 12 years should be imposed.
The State submits that minimum sentences should not be departed from lightly and should ordinarily be imposed. Regarding a life sentence, the Court has the discretion which is not fettered by the minimum sentence legislation insofar as its ability to impose a sentence higher than the minimum prescribed inappropriate sentence. Sentences in excess of the minimum sentence are appropriate if they are commensurate with the seriousness of the offences. The SCA confirmed a life sentence. Their decision was largely based on the appellant's lack of remorse which the court found so aggravating.
The Judge told Adv. Webster that "The aspect that you should address for me is the aspect of femicide in South Africa, and the views of the courts relating to femicide in South Africa and the prevalence of the violence towards women, and more particularly to partners in SA, men on their partners, female partners. There are a lot of judgments that I hope Miss Galloway will refer me to, I think lots of judgments relating to that aspect which I presume will be argued to be aggravating factors. Should you not also tell me about that that because it obviously is something I will have to bear in mind".
If RP got the minimum sentence of 15 years, he could be out in half that time as it is a first offence. There would be no justice for Gill at all IMO if that were the case. I feel Judge Steyn wants to give him more than 15. The question is, will she give him a life sentence.
Sentencing has been set down for tomorrow, Wednesday, 12 June at 11:00am.