Interested Bystander
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2013
- Messages
- 3,638
- Reaction score
- 345
That will be noon in the Uk. We might get to hear the verdict but not much time to comment. What a pain.
That will be noon in the Uk. We might get to hear the verdict but not much time to comment. What a pain.
Thank you JJ.Listen to Tracey Stewart’s final instalment here re the forthcoming judgment. She is joined by Kelly Phelps, a lecturer in criminal law at the University of Cape Town.
Those who followed the OP trial will recall that she was very biased towards him and was proven to be incorrect in her assessment of that case.
Listen to Tracey Stewart’s final instalment here re the forthcoming judgment. She is joined by Kelly Phelps, a lecturer in criminal law at the University of Cape Town.
Those who followed the OP trial will recall that she was very biased towards him and was proven to be incorrect in her assessment of that case.
Thank you JJ.
When they were discussing an absence of motive for Henri as the perpetrator, I was struck by their apparent disregard for his demeanour in court.
I'm not saying the court needs to have expertise to make a psychological evaluation, but to me it was evident that he is callous, arrogant, indifferent to the slaughter and loss of his family, unmoved by the 'memory', even finding humour in it at times and seeing it as a game of one-upmanship, and I am left in no doubt at all that he is a psychopath. Even making allowances for the stress and nerves of being on trial, this guy is just soulless.
One doesn't need motive in that instance, in the way that we might consider what would cause a normal individual to slaughter his entire family; any perceived wrong or slight would be enough to trigger a cold narcissistic rage. He is so dark. The pictures of him in the ambulance that morning show he was not scared or traumatized by the horrors of that morning, his whole family lying in a bloodbath, bludgeoned and dead. Not a tear. He is not normal, and it would be wrong for the State to try to justify or invent a motive as if there could be a 'normal' family axe-murder. He just wanted rid of them all, like they were in his way, an inconvenience to his existence because with them alive he had accountability.
There is no care or love in a black hole. He didn't need their care or love. He is on a one-man island, sauntering in and out of the courtroom. IMO.
I am in total agreement with you JJ.
One of the pieces of evidence (there are so many!) that sticks out in my mind is the droplet (s?) of blood in the shower containing a mixture of DNA. His explanation was that they both shave in the shower. Well I'd like to see the statistical chances of them both shaving and shedding blood that would mix in the same droplet.
I see different times IB. Assuming Court starts at 10.00 am in SA, look here to see the times for the UK, Sydney and Eastern time in the USA.
In the UK we are 5 hours ahead of Eastern Time in the USA. We are in British Summer Time now not Greenwich Meantime so 7am Eastern is 12 o'clock mid day in the UK and SA is 1 hour ahead of us i.e. 1 pm. Cape Town is 6 hours ahead of Eastern Time, so 7am Eastern will be 1pm in Cape Town. That should allow us to hear/see 3 hours of court before WS goes down but that includes breaks. Surely we shall hear the verdict by then. I am going to set an alarm to remind me to switch on at 9am UK time for start of proceedings.
IB, look at the link again and you will see that SA time is one hour ahead of you. Just underneath the times for the various locations under “Glossary” it states “Note that United Kingdom is not on GMT during summer” so your time has been adjusted for daylight saving. All these times will give us 3 hours, i.e. until 1pm in SA, noon in London, 9pm Sydney and 7am in the US.