JudgeJudi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2014
- Messages
- 10,620
- Reaction score
- 31,350
Judge Desai: did his evidence being lead the way he did, impact either parties case? Should I draw inference from the fact that the accused did not testify before his experts
Judge Desai: in this case there is no prejudice –
Adv G: other than it would have made it easier to cross examine the states experts
Adv G: Accused spoke in a very confident and superior manner providing probable explanations when he couldnt remember
Adv G: the accused still tried to give an explanation for everything he couldnt remember, even when not in a position to do so, he would continue to try and justify and reason his decisions
[url]https://twitter.com/traceyams?lang=en[/URL]
Judge Desai: in this case there is no prejudice –
Adv G: other than it would have made it easier to cross examine the states experts
Adv G: Accused spoke in a very confident and superior manner providing probable explanations when he couldnt remember
Adv G: the accused still tried to give an explanation for everything he couldnt remember, even when not in a position to do so, he would continue to try and justify and reason his decisions
[url]https://twitter.com/traceyams?lang=en[/URL]