JudgeJudi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2014
- Messages
- 10,622
- Reaction score
- 31,380
Security: accused alleged intruder attacked in the early hours of the morning. De Zalze wine estate is a security state. Rossouw security manager explained the lay out of the estate, refers to map.
On 27 January when Wyngaard reported again for night duty he inspected the fence and testified that it was impossible for any intruder to gain access to the estate undetected.
There seems to be a discrepancy as to which security personnel attended to the patrol. The court is not convinced that the patrol at 01h37 was done in response to an alarm.
Rossouw testified that a loud screen with an irritating alarm would pop up on the screen, the alarm actived at 01h37 was described as a "not true alarm".
Murders probably committed between 0400 and 04h24, if it was a true alarm a possible intruder would have wondered around the estate for a few hours undetected without comitting any other murders.
It may have been a deliberate alarm to test the fence. After Rossouw found out about the incident she instructed an inspection of the fence cm by cm nothing unusual or suspect was reported.
Rossouw said there were no signs of foot prints along the fence. Defence said that residents were actively running near the fence, accused agreed that it was a fair assessment that the intruders would go through quite a bit of trouble to enter estate.
Neighbour Op tHof testified that she felt secure in the estate, Taljaard said she felt safe, she would leave her children alone when she went swimming. None of them reported any incident that night. The only noise reported was by Op't Hof earlier in the evening, loud mens voices.
Highly improbable that intruder could access the estate undetected. Despite lengthy cross examination the defence was unable to present actual evidence of a security breach.
Philander for emergency services received a call from the accused, it lasted 25 minutes accused was emotional while it was played in court, the sound clips were correct. Accused testified that he stuttered.
https://twitter.com/traceyams?lang=en
On 27 January when Wyngaard reported again for night duty he inspected the fence and testified that it was impossible for any intruder to gain access to the estate undetected.
There seems to be a discrepancy as to which security personnel attended to the patrol. The court is not convinced that the patrol at 01h37 was done in response to an alarm.
Rossouw testified that a loud screen with an irritating alarm would pop up on the screen, the alarm actived at 01h37 was described as a "not true alarm".
Murders probably committed between 0400 and 04h24, if it was a true alarm a possible intruder would have wondered around the estate for a few hours undetected without comitting any other murders.
It may have been a deliberate alarm to test the fence. After Rossouw found out about the incident she instructed an inspection of the fence cm by cm nothing unusual or suspect was reported.
Rossouw said there were no signs of foot prints along the fence. Defence said that residents were actively running near the fence, accused agreed that it was a fair assessment that the intruders would go through quite a bit of trouble to enter estate.
Neighbour Op tHof testified that she felt secure in the estate, Taljaard said she felt safe, she would leave her children alone when she went swimming. None of them reported any incident that night. The only noise reported was by Op't Hof earlier in the evening, loud mens voices.
Highly improbable that intruder could access the estate undetected. Despite lengthy cross examination the defence was unable to present actual evidence of a security breach.
Philander for emergency services received a call from the accused, it lasted 25 minutes accused was emotional while it was played in court, the sound clips were correct. Accused testified that he stuttered.
https://twitter.com/traceyams?lang=en