BBM
Thank you for reminding me of this - I was thinking that the DP was automatic if found guilty. Reinforcement is good - I can no longer remember what I have already learned - there's too much!
Thanks, Muzikman! As always, we really appreciate what you do for us! :blowkiss: All I can say is it is about d^mn time! Let's hear it for the SA saying something that makes sense to people who have spouted nonsense for a year now! :clap: And, am I the only one who feels like if the judge doesn't read this motion and take JB and Co. to task for making what were clearly egregious claims about the SA, I will have lost all respect for that court? Enough is enough! A child is dead and all evidence points to her mother. Let a jury hear the evidence and be done with it. She is not special. She is a common, garden variety, sociopathic murderer. Lock her up and let that baby rest in peace! MOO!
They must further establish that at the time of it's destruction, its' value to prove the innocence of the Defendant, its' exculpatory value, was apparent. A mere allegation that the evidence was potentially useful is insufficient
I love (on page 2) the line that begins 'It is interesting to note...' and the following line that begins 'What are noticably absent...'
The SA has a way with words.
Thank you kindly MM!
gotta love Ashton. he really has a way of sticking it to Jose without veiling his true feelings at all. i find myself grinning after reading his motions.
Yep! I love that too.
I also love the 'facts' section.