State v Bradley Cooper 04-19-2011

[less0305]

The problem is even if they find somebody else, having charged and tried somebody else for the murder leads to some pretty clear reasonable doubt for the next trial.

Especially after the CPD is accused of being corrupt and planting evidence. Cary will be lucky to have any crimes solved and someone serving time for them in the future. Don't think defense attorneys won't on jump that bandwagon and ride it for quite some time.

 

[Just the Fax]

Oh okay. You said you wished you could have stood next to him, so I thought it was something a little more personal.

That's not what I said.

 

[SleuthinNC]

That is really none of your business. Why do you ask? Does it matter for some reason or another?

Wow - I didn't realize what a great memory you have? Impressive.

These personal comments are just an attempt to get you riled up so you type something that gets you put in a "time out" so you can't post your relevant opinions. Using the "Ignore List" is your friend here. I'd hate to lose your perspective.

 

[Just the Fax]

Especially after the CPD is accused of being corrupt and planting evidence. Cary will be lucky to have any crimes solved and someone serving time for them in the future. Don't think defense attorneys won't on jump that bandwagon and ride it for quite some time.

But less035, unlike the SBI from years ago, calling out CPD for dishonesty has absolutely no validity. Kurtz is the one that has hurt himself with LE and the DA's office. "Deals" for his clients may be harder to come by now.

 

[cody100]

These personal comments are just an attempt to get you riled up so you type something that gets you put in a "time out" so you can't post your relevant opinions. Using the "Ignore List" is your friend here. I'd hate to lose your perspective.

I dito sleuth's comments. Just use Ignore so you don't get put in a time out.

 

[Albert]

No, I am sure CPD took over the house, BC left and they had access to the powered up computer for 27 hours. Don't know the exact dates but this has not been disputed.

I don't think they needed the password. The PC was up and running.

The laptop was shown to be in a locked state, ctrl-alt-del and then password.

 

[Just the Fax]

Can we discuss the case w/o all this childish banter?
Yes, ignore is a good thing.
Several of you, please feel free to use it on me....I would be honored.

 

[less0305]

But less035, unlike the SBI from years ago, calling out CPD for dishonesty has absolutely no validity. Kurtz is the one that has hurt himself with LE and the DA's office. "Deals" for his clients may be harder to come by now.

It's gonna be hard times for drug dealers, huh?

 

[jrb0124]

Kurtz is the one that has hurt himself with LE and the DA's office. "Deals" for his clients may be harder to come by now.

I'm glad he's putting it all on the line for his client, and not sacrificing that advocacy for some undetermined future deals for undetermined future clients. In my book, that's the way to prove your salt.

 

[Danielle59]

He and I did several of the same events and trained in the same area. I didn't know him but I also don't know anyone who didn't ride that road. That and Kildaire provided the elevation. He was doing distance cycling but didn't ride the circuit around his house? He was training for rides over 100 miles and didn't leave his neighborhood?

Ok, I've never asked him and I don't know him so I don't know that he did the practical, reasonable, almost impossible to avoid thing. But I believe he would have, to accomplish the events he chose to participate in. And he would have seen the Fielding Dr. sign.

Granted if one is wedded to believing in innocence at all costs, one could think he was sequestered in his home (despite training for long distance triathlons) without knowledge of nearby roads and yet also had his computer hacked, all to support his not knowing about the street his wife was dumped on.

Bottom line, you don't know that he rode on Holly Springs Rd. Because you did it and would do it you assume he did also, but, you don't know. No one said anything about being sequestered in his home, but you still don't know if he rode there or rode somewhere else, you are making an assumption based on what you would do.

 

[Cheyenne130]

The laptop was shown to be in a locked state, ctrl-alt-del and then password.

I tried to find the picture earlier. I know they have a picture in evidence of the state of the computer when they took control of it so the jury has it. I couldn't find it in order to satisfy myself.

 

[sunshine05]

Especially after the CPD is accused of being corrupt and planting evidence. Cary will be lucky to have any crimes solved and someone serving time for them in the future. Don't think defense attorneys won't on jump that bandwagon and ride it for quite some time.

After watching this trial, do you really not think they were being evasive and purposely forgetful/borderline lying? (long sleeves versus short is a "typo")? They are not doing the citizens of Cary any favors with their obvious incompetence.

 

[johnfear]

Thanks for you observations johnfear.

Some posters here felt the witness was a third rate hack, who BC 'would look down his nose at', who lost the jury in testimony, will get torn up on cross and perhaps lied for $$$.

Glad to hear this is not true from your perspective. I also thought he came across as genuine, and did a good job today.

He is not a third rate hack and I don't want him getting NEAR my computer, EVER. However, I do think some of his pros fits were set-ups. I am betting Kurtz went over the real questions and Blum came in and tore him apart, ala Zellinger to get some reactions. Why? Because the detectives were so stoney, it made him seem real.

I knew of him beforehand and googled him after. I think the whole point of his (whatever that V word is where they prequalify you sans jury voir dire?) was to get Zellinger riled at the forensic part only to then have Kurtz focus on the network idea. (And this is something that the Cisco Security team and CPD could have easily done ala forensic preview/blackberry debacle, so it comes across nicely).

I am just excited that it wasn't a blow out for either side. I knew both sides were very talented coming in and it has been awesome to watch the meltdowns it has created. (The technology stuff really is going to be the thing to watch in the future, so that has me more captivated than the actual trial itself)

 

[unc70]

So, I am just catching up on the posts for the evening. So, I am trying to understand the probability of such actions and am wondering if this list is complete. So, I don't have a windoze to test with but wouldn't one of the event viewer logs indicate a system clock change has been made. So, if so, then the hacker must also have deleted entries from the event viewer. So, I am wondering is a friendly windoze user could test to verify that event viewer log would indicate a time change, I am thinking the system event viewer log.

Wondered about that myself. I looked at that on a current XP SP3 system, set the date back a few days, did a few things, set the date back to the correct day. I was surprised to see that the only indication in the Event Log of changing the date was that on each changing of the date, Norton reported losing the TCPIP connection on the wireless. Events in log would carry the changed time/date, but nothing more and even that would soon age out or could have been explicitly erased.

Have not spent the time to see what would happen with browser logs and such. Not reassured by what I found. Admit that this system did not have any of the Cisco or other extra security. Just Norton and a bunch of other typical geek software (psi, ccleaner, malwarebytes, etc.). Have not had time to really dig into this. Don't use MS Win for much besides watching trials from home. Not allowed inside my company network.

 

[Albert]

Is it reasonable that any of the neighbors decided to mess with the computer ... one comes to mind right away. I don't know his name, but he's the guy that had quite the attitude on the stand, who I think swore a bit and who lived across the street. Is it reasonable that he, his wife and all her friends were convinced that Brad was guilty before the investigation started, and is it reasonable that this gang of neighbors matched their stories, covered for each other and gave police whatever they could to ensure that Brad was arrested? Is it then reasonable to wonder how far this gang of neighbors was willing to go to see their justice done?

After all the testimony we saw from the neighbors, I have no problem believing that they were willing to do whatever they thought necessary to have Brad convicted.

interesting, I too have noticed an increasing number of black helicopters hovering over lochmere.

 

[CaryFrom NJ]

Just wondered if you were out of school for spring break, that's all.
And yes, I clearly recalled you saying you were female.
I could care less of course...just brought it up since you decided to for some reason?

Nope. Not on spring break. Not in school. Married. Female. Two small children. Live in Lochmere. Successful career. Mid 30's. Does that suffice? Anything else I can answer for you?

Am I mature enough for you? Because YOUR maturity level seems to be the one in question, by quite a few posters here.

You obviously did care less because you were the one asking my age, not me offering it.

 

[Just the Fax]

I'm glad he's putting it all on the line for his client, and not sacrificing that advocacy for some undetermined future deals for undetermined future clients. In my book, that's the way to prove your salt.

iMO, his zeal is not for his client that he believes is innocent (what a joke).
He is playing for the cameras for much needed publicity for his firm.

 

[less0305]

After watching this trial, do you really not think they were being evasive and purposely forgetful/borderline lying? (long sleeves versus short is a "typo")? They are not doing the citizens of Cary any favors with their obvious incompetence.

No, I don't. That is all.

 

[Just the Fax]

Cary from NJ, please put me on ignore....thanks!
I am tired of your sarcastic posts directed to me.

 

[less0305]

iMO, his zeal is not for his client that he believes is innocent (what a joke).
He is playing for the cameras for much needed publicity for his firm.

Hey, times are tough all over - even law firms are feeling the pinch. A shark gotta do what a shark gotta do to eat.