As a newbie here, I made the early morning HT run today. We've got cinnamon and hot cross buns today, enough to share. Should be an interesting day.
Thanks, but we need you to make another run for juice.
pic but no sound?
Quick peek at picture as judge turned them over, it looked like a mug shot.
IMO.
Because it may not be apparent to some, I'd like to point out that there is more going on with the discussion than "is BC guilty or not?". Those questioning the pros case and evidence are not necessarily supportive of the defendent, and vice versa. I think most level-headed posters on here have an interest in seeing justice served - even at the cost of an outcome which may contradict a personal belief of G or NG.
1) I believe BC is guilty, and the state has presented a strong case and dispelled any reasonable doubt.
2) I believe BC is guilty, the state has presented an adequate case to dispel any reasonable doubt.
3) I believe BC is guilty, but the state has presented a weak case to dispel any reasonable doubt.
4) I am unsure of BC guilt, the state has presented a strong case and dispelled any reasonable doubt.
5) I am unsure of BC guilt, the state has presented an adequate case to dispel any reasonable doubt.
6) I am unsure of BC guilt, the state has presented a weak case to dispel any reasonable doubt.
7) I believe BG is innocent, but the state has presented a strong case and dispelled any reasonable doubt.
8) I believe BG is innocent, but the state has presented an adequate case to dispel any reasonable doubt.
9) I believe BG is innocent, and state has presented a weak case to dispel any reasonable doubt.
I think most posters here fall into one of: 2,3,5,6,8,9
1 would suggest the inability to view the case objectively, 4 and 7 really don't make sense at this point.
The state really does not want the jury to hear what JW has to say. They are certainly reaching deep down into their bag of tricks.
As a newbie here, I made the early morning HT run today. We've got cinnamon and hot cross buns today, enough to share. Should be an interesting day.
I have become compelled to witness this case from the 1st day Nancy was reported missing and because of a connected feeling to Nancy and her loved ones. I would have loved to have met her in person. I feel so deeply for her family, her beautiful children, and her friends, but most of all for Nancy who for the selfish motives of Brad Cooper, will not get to see her children grow up, nor they to have their Mom. the loss is beyond words
the brad :loser::loser::loser: showed us in at least 5,000 ways that he was a liar. That's the differences that the human eye can detect in a portrait compared to reality Not everyone can paint a realistic portrait, because it is so difficult to attend to all the details, but all of us can view the piece of work. Though it is not proof....it is the stuff that juries see.....when they look at his deposition, it is written all over his face. Arrogance can't be faked. Neither can the truth. I know arrogance when I see it! I also know the truth when I see it! Very transparent. From an artist's perspective.
Alice Stubbs......Wow! I have to say that the depo is just as much of a smoking gun as the Google search. She laid him open and filleted him like a flat flounder. Every fishy, flaky thing he said was put out there for all to see! (IMO) THANK YOU ALICE STUBBS! Right person, right place, right time.
Lil K was no match.....he didn't even make the slightest peep for the perp. Brad hired lil K.....goes to show you....he wasn't as smart as he thought.
New Member here just saying what I have to say. Thanks, Jenny :seeya: