I might add that I don't remember the testimony about the earring the same way as stated in WRAL's last update.
You are right, the print update got it wrong about the earring.
Soooo...a random attacker did not remove NC's diamond earrings but instead took shoes, socks, shorts. And in a huge coinky dink, NC left her diamond necklace at home (the one she always wore) and it ended up in Brad's desk.
riggghhhht.
Welcome CaryCanuck! Do you (being from the land of Canadia) remove your shoes before entering your home? I understand this is the province of Canadians (per H Kurtz opening statements). :wink:
NC's running partner said in her testimony that NC NEVER wore necklace while jogging
So, this morning's testimony regarding the black tank top, since I didn't get to hear all of it, what was the significance?
NC's running partner said in her testimony that NC NEVER wore necklace while jogging
What in the world is BC writing?
I interpreted it as just a rabbit trail on the part of the defense to plant the seed she could have been wearing it and her "attacker" tore it from her body.:innocent:
Except that it was put into evidence by the prosecution...
Re: the blank tank (as well as the shoe)
The state is showing that CPD DID look at possible evidence found by citizens and they collected this evidence to see if it was related to NC missing. This is to counter Kurtz saying that CPD didn't look for evidence.