Cheyenne130
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2008
- Messages
- 1,823
- Reaction score
- 0
(I just want to go on record and say how very HAPPY I am that snowshuze is back reporting for us!)
My understanding is that a juror said something or was there when something was said about the case. Somebody who was there told JA and JA told the prosecutor's office. That's the trail as I got the bits and pieces.
What does this mean?? A mistial??
I would assume that the juror would be replaced by an alternate and things will resume..and the juror who did this would be excused..tho investigation could show more than just one juror involved??..JMOO of course!!
Is the possibility of juror misconduct somehow related to the reason they are taking a witness out of order? I might have missed the explanation.
Is the possibility of juror misconduct somehow related to the reason they are taking a witness out of order? I might have missed the explanation.