Sunshine05,
Please understand that I am not being snarky or sarcastic, but I do have to point out a couple of inconsistancies with your comments, especially in light of your previous post about letting the evidence speak.
Mentioning the specific garment she was found in might have been a Freudian Slip.
The neck scratches and bandaid are not Hearsay, they were in testimony by LE.
Cell phones might be confusing, but he worked with phones and technology for a living. You are a chemist, if someone asked you how to work a simple chemical reaction, you would either know how to do it, or would be able to find out quickly.
"she told him she was going for a run..." THIS is hearsay, from the accused no less. There has been no corroboration that she ever left the house under her own power.
"Missing items" Is not hearsay, there is photographic evidence that the items mentioned in testimony as having been seen on Friday are not in the area on Saturday. I will leave the "bad vibes" comment to stand on its own merit.
Perhaps a random crime. That is still a possible explaination. But why take all the clothing mentioned and leave something of value. Why is was there no evidence of a struggle? While ME testified that it was possible that there was some brusing that was covered by the decomposition on the side of her face, if she had been running, someone would have had to grab her, or knock her down. There is no firm evidence that she had any injuries other than a fractured Hyoid bone.
Again, not being snarky, but I saw some misconceptions in your post.