The BDI and BII folks will never agree on how they reach their conclusions. CE is based often on opinions, often biased and skewed observations, feelings, guesses, and gut feelings so I find it rather amusing that BDI group want to criticize the BII folks for using similar methods to come to their conclusions. I admit that CE also includes situations, opportunities, and means/methods. But, I too would be wealthy if I got a $1 for every time I heard those "feeling" words from the BDI.
Then there are the Fence sitters who are still evaluating evidence in a methodical manner. None of the three categories are more right or more wrong than the other=====just different viewpoints.
The only issue I have with this post is the use of "methodical manner". It seems to me that those with this thought pattern use any method to discount BC involvement while at the same time grasping at straws to prove anyone else is possibly involved. Methodical manner would at least question BC involvement, correct? Instead, with the same lack of evidence, the methodical manner type will raise suspicion of computer hacking, secret lover, police tampering, ineptness and corruption. The judge is biased, the ADA are in a rush to judgment, etc.