NCEast
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2011
- Messages
- 4,217
- Reaction score
- 7
Better?
Yes, thank you!
Better?
I will find something else. Someone stole the running man and they seemed to fit it more. Was trying to be fair but unique and prove that innocuous things can seem creepy!!!!!
I just watched it again, she doesn't appear to be leaning forward, she just seems closer to the camera which is at an angle.
I will find something else. Someone stole the running man and they seemed to fit it more. Was trying to be fair but unique and prove that innocuous things can seem creepy!!!!!
And that's what you settle on? Are you confirming that you work for the defense?
Better?
I don't think so, based on the way the files appeared. Files were created and then deleted, which is different than just taking a look. I suppose it's possible it was them though, but not likely imo.
And that's what you settle on? Are you confirming that you work for the defense?
Nope...they got it right...they know exactly what was going on in that house...IMHO.
Were any of our regular posters in court today? Any thoughts/observations?
The watermark thing left me all and :dunno: and I guess I should say Boz hone: me and tell me what :worms: you've been :ignore: ing.
I can't :banghead: all night before I fftobed: because then I will :countsheep: and tomorrow be all :slapfight: and need to :HHJP: and hear Gessner saying: :denied: and the jury will be back in that room arty: and asking we gonna be here til :christmastree: and our grandkids :cake:.
You've had nearly three years to :websleuther: Right now, your case is about as tight as if HK was to say :abduction:
Please cut to the chase and help us see something.
You like that:
Nancy NEVER took off the necklace.
Brad only gave her $80 a week.
That HE was the only one who had an affair.
I mean i just listed THREE things, off the TOP of my head, that were used as MAJOR "CE" evidence in a MURDER trial, that were ALL found to be COMPLETELY false. How much OTHER stuff did they "know", that they didn't really "know"?
The watermark thing left me all and :dunno: and I guess I should say Boz hone: me and tell me what :worms: you've been :ignore: ing.
I can't :banghead: all night before I fftobed: because then I will :countsheep: and tomorrow be all :slapfight: and need to :HHJP: and hear Gessner saying: :denied: and the jury will be back in that room arty: and asking we gonna be here til :christmastree: and our grandkids :cake:.
You've had nearly three years to :websleuther: Right now, your case is about as tight as if HK was to say :abduction:
Please cut to the chase and help us see something.
I'd say this case is basically in the same place it would have been at 2:15 PM on July 11th, 2008
gracielee will be very proud of you. I have a feeling she's on her 10th time reading this with a big grin on her face. Just made her day.
I see where the diamond is. The link to the video and some photos I pulled from it. What do you think?
http://www.wral.com/specialreports/nancycooper/story/9515458/
But is 2:15 on July 11th 2008 a valid timestamp or not? I'm confused. :waitasec:
I will find something else. Someone stole the running man and they seemed to fit it more. Was trying to be fair but unique and prove that innocuous things can seem creepy!!!!!
Your new picture is hysterical!