State v. Bradley Cooper 4-29-2011

[macd]

Correct. I was questioning if the router was at home or if he accessed one through at Cisco through his VPN connection.

I'm re-watching today's proceedings right now. BZ said specifically that the router is in use in the home.

 

[Nietzsche-nor]

Ugh. Back on the fence, just in time for a looong 2 day time=out.

 

[SleuthinNC]

I'm re-watching today's proceedings right now. BZ said specifically that the router is in use in the home.

That was in relation to the chat logs from January not the July event log entry.

 

[less0305]

BC definitely does. :maddening:

That pointed forehead just skeeres me.

 

[macd]

Exactly...what if the MAC address can be mapped to a serial number for the device and that serial number can be mapped to the purchase order? smoking!

That's what was said in court today.
That serial number has been mapped to a router that belonged to BC's team. That router was not found when the team did an inventory in Sept 2008.
BC discussed with a team member the idea of bringing that router home in Jan 2008.

BTW... I was wrong earlier. I stated that the 3825 was too big, loud, and hot to be used as a home router. It appears that BC did use it as a home router.
(I stand by my statement that the 3825 is big, loud, and hot.)

 

[less0305]

IMO.That would open up another whole :worms:..as ALL Nancy's itens were at the home..like her cell phone, her computer, her neckalce, her green dress her car keys??..I somehow think he planned this for so long he just didnt figure out there may be another alternative..He had his computer stuff all set up to spoof..and manipulate "malware/hackings/supposedly" all sorts of things..He is his best "ADVISOR" to lead his defense on how to counteract things!! LOL.....So NO Maja..that would never be an option for Bradley..He had already set things ups..:banghead:..Not sure how resilient he is given his inabiity to adjust or communicate outside of his "Saftey Zone" of Expertise....

IF nothing else, Brad lacks a well rounded life skills..IMO:banghead:

Are you saying what I've been saying, but you're saying it more eloquently? Brad might have an MBA, be an expert at whatever it is that he does at work, be a technological junkie who knows technology backwards and forwards - BUT when it comes right down to common sense he doesn't have the sense to get in out of the rain.

 

[Wyn]

Way, way, way, way, wayyyyyyyyyy off topic here, but last night's Big Bang Theory was hilarious!!! Just watched it on DVR and just had to say that. :floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh:

Sheldon dancing! :rocker: I love how he blackmailed "Prea" or whatever her name is. Back to our regularly scheduled programming...........

 

[macd]

That account is inaccurate. It has already been entered into testimony that Cisco does not have an inventory control mechanism to "check out" routers.

From court today:
BC discussed with co-worker in Jan 2008 about bringing home a 3825, and requested a key to a storage area.
A 3825 was not found in the storage area when an inventory was done in Sept 2008.
The MAC address of the missing 3825 appears on BC's laptop in a Windows system event log created on 10:21pm 7/11/08. (Note: MAC addresses are used for local networks, e.g. same house, as opposed to IP addresses that are used over the Internet.)

But, yea, poor reporting from N&O. What else is new?

 

[3doglady]

So the defense could have checked the mac address and discovered that it belonged to a 3825 without information from Cisco? If so I understand why the judge allowed it.

 

[Tink56]

From court today:
BC discussed with co-worker in Jan 2008 about bringing home a 3825, and requested a key to a storage area.
A 3825 was not found in the storage area when an inventory was done in Sept 2008.
The MAC address of the missing 3825 appears on BC's laptop in a Windows system event log created on 10:21pm 7/11/08. (Note: MAC addresses are used for local networks, e.g. same house, as opposed to IP addresses that are used over the Internet.)

But, yea, poor reporting from N&O. What else is new?

WOW! I've been "away" and this is outstanding news. Where is everyone?

Looks like Kurtz and crew are off looking for an expert to say this is really a Dyson vac in disguise...Brad used it for cleaning.

Seriously, does this newer information make sense to WS's computer experts?

 

[johnfear]

That's what was said in court today.
That serial number has been mapped to a router that belonged to BC's team. That router was not found when the team did an inventory in Sept 2008.
BC discussed with a team member the idea of bringing that router home in Jan 2008.

BTW... I was wrong earlier. I stated that the 3825 was too big, loud, and hot to be used as a home router. It appears that BC did use it as a home router.
(I stand by my statement that the 3825 is big, loud, and hot.)

Pardon me. Create the weekend thread now. I am going to be the one tonight who gets the thread locked out.

MacD, I am with you in spirit, but you are getting called out (mainly because I was sitting in the back of the court as CFry spoke)

This is one more piece of evidence thrown out on appeal (flame me now, or forever hold your power supplies).

I don't care if Cisco comes up and says: He actually killed her by Bldg. #9 on our campus and we have video.

LEGALLY (which is what we have concerns with here in Wake County anyways) Kurtz has proven his case.

Bring in the Buzzard and Ducks specialists. It doesn't matter.

Bring in the routers that we can't keep track of. It doesn't matter.

Here's what went on today that I don't like LEGALLY:

Boz is a DIE-HARDER (meaning, I will do anything to become a DA, Judge, Superman, Slightly larger than life martyr) and is LYING to the judge and jury.

He loses ALL (and I repeat the words 100%) credibility at that point.

No matter what it is, it is too little, too late at this point, in the interest of preservation of our legal system (hanging by a thread in NC as it is).

YOU DO NOT lie to judges and CONFUSE judges for a WIN.

You tell the TRUTH. YOU, as a PROSECUTOR, follow case law, not OBSCURE IT.

Seriously, you have to do the same thing he is doing....

The DEFENSE debunked the flawed case of a MURDERER (whomever they were) and you do not THROW HORSE PUCKEY PATTIES at a jury in hour 12 and act like it's cool.

The judge, the DEFENSE and the prosecutors, (previously the CPD) screwed this case up. Badly. They lost ALL semblance of justice from the good faith of the constitution around week 3.

Your case was WRONG (not that he killed her, but in the timeline, the case law and the facts and circumstances).

BRAD COOPER, as evil an SOB, as he might be walks so that A) we can put JY away as the killer of MY as he is, and RA away, as the killer of his wife that he is and CA away as the killer of her child that SHE is.

Seriously, PAY ATTENTION TO THE CASE. THE EVIDENCE as introduced. DON'T be swayed by emotion and rhetoric. It might get you a good deal on CRACK on Hargett, but NOT in jury votes. This JURY will vote NG based on what has been presented unless the closing says:

Please forgive us, our INVESTIGATORS went astray in July 2008 and SUCKED.
Our forensics took til (six hours ago) to confirm us right.

Our POlice SUCK. Our METHODS suck. Our LE community sucks. OUR ADA with MYSPACE and GROOVESHARK knowledge is YOUNG and inexperienced and SUCKS.

But, try to remember, our consititution is only a couple hundred years old. IT's NEW too.

We be learning. Let this man be told that he snapped and killed his wife in cold blood with a charge of second degree murder.

But don't hold us accountable for TELLING YOU that we HAVE NOTHING.

Only hold us accountable for jumping to conclusions and pulling this off at the last nanosecond because you have SEEN IT BEFORE on LIFETIME and LAW and ORDER and CSI. This dude did it.

Just trus' us. It happned like we be saying. Even if we can't be proving it.

Cummings? You got anything (Nawwwww.....ummmmmm, No. Hate them ducks and non-necklace photos in HT)

BTW---the forensic Witnesses were denied because of money. We spent it all on jury selection (wink, wink, nudge, nudge)

Hey, Boz, take it away on omegle.com tonite. Tell us how it really is.

"Judge, these people are crazy".

 

[ncsu95]

So the defense could have checked the mac address and discovered that it belonged to a 3825 without information from Cisco? If so I understand why the judge allowed it.

No they could not have. And, it's a valid argument to say the prosecution had the exact same information as the defense, yet they didn't offer it during their case-in-chief.

 

[ohiogirl]

So you think

he is guilty but the pros and judge is playng games.

Do you want justice or do you want tech proof

I say we have a free for all with evidence,

Let it all out everyone


Frustration

the jury feels it

 

[ncsu95]

Pardon me. Create the weekend thread now. I am going to be the one tonight who gets the thread locked out.

MacD, I am with you in spirit, but you are getting called out (mainly because I was sitting in the back of the court as CFry spoke)

This is one more piece of evidence thrown out on appeal (flame me now, or forever hold your power supplies).

I don't care if Cisco comes up and says: He actually killed her by Bldg. #9 on our campus and we have video.

LEGALLY (which is what we have concerns with here in Wake County anyways) Kurtz has proven his case.

Bring in the Buzzard and Ducks specialists. It doesn't matter.

Bring in the routers that we can't keep track of. It doesn't matter.

Here's what went on today that I don't like LEGALLY:

Boz is a DIE-HARDER (meaning, I will do anything to become a DA, Judge, Superman, Slightly larger than life martyr) and is LYING to the judge and jury.

He loses ALL (and I repeat the words 100%) credibility at that point.

No matter what it is, it is too little, too late at this point, in the interest of preservation of our legal system (hanging by a thread in NC as it is).

YOU DO NOT lie to judges and CONFUSE judges for a WIN.

You tell the TRUTH. YOU, as a PROSECUTOR, follow case law, not OBSCURE IT.

Seriously, you have to do the same thing he is doing....

The DEFENSE debunked the flawed case of a MURDERER (whomever they were) and you do not THROW HORSE PUCKEY PATTIES at a jury in hour 12 and act like it's cool.

The judge, the DEFENSE and the prosecutors, (previously the CPD) screwed this case up. Badly. They lost ALL semblance of justice from the good faith of the constitution around week 3.

Your case was WRONG (not that he killed her, but in the timeline, the case law and the facts and circumstances).

BRAD COOPER, as evil an SOB, as he might be walks so that A) we can put JY away as the killer of MY as he is, and RA away, as the killer of his wife that he is and CA away as the killer of her child that SHE is.

Seriously, PAY ATTENTION TO THE CASE. THE EVIDENCE as introduced. DON'T be swayed by emotion and rhetoric. It might get you a good deal on CRACK on Hargett, but NOT in jury votes. This JURY will vote NG based on what has been presented unless the closing says:

Please forgive us, our INVESTIGATORS went astray in July 2008 and SUCKED.
Our forensics took til (six hours ago) to confirm us right.

Our POlice SUCK. Our METHODS suck. Our LE community sucks. OUR ADA with MYSPACE and GROOVESHARK knowledge is YOUNG and inexperienced and SUCKS.

But, try to remember, our consititution is only a couple hundred years old. IT's NEW too.

We be learning. Let this man be told that he snapped and killed his wife in cold blood with a charge of second degree murder.

But don't hold us accountable for TELLING YOU that we HAVE NOTHING.

Only hold us accountable for jumping to conclusions and pulling this off at the last nanosecond because you have SEEN IT BEFORE on LIFETIME and LAW and ORDER and CSI. This dude did it.

Just trus' us. It happned like we be saying. Even if we can't be proving it.

Cummings? You got anything (Nawwwww.....ummmmmm, No. Hate them ducks and non-necklace photos in HT)

BTW---the forensic Witnesses were denied because of money. We spent it all on jury selection (wink, wink, nudge, nudge)

Hey, Boz, take it away on omegle.com tonite. Tell us how it really is.

"Judge, these people are crazy".

Can you tell us what Frye is going to say (or what he did say today)?

 

[ohiogirl]

Bring it on, all the tech evidence, go for it everyone, prove anything you can

 

[3doglady]

No they could not have. And, it's a valid argument to say the prosecution had the exact same information as the defense, yet they didn't offer it during their case-in-chief.

Thanks, is that why JF is saying BZ lied to the judge? Because I thought BZ made it sound like anyone could find out what the mac address belonged to.

 

[gracielee]

Hopefully you've gotten that out of your system now, and we can rationally converse once again. The only proven liar here is Brad Cooper.

 

[ohiogirl]

Hopefully you've gotten that out of your system now, and we can rationally converse once again. The only proven liar here is Brad Cooper.

Sorry, too many frustrations

 

[3doglady]

Can you tell us what Frye is going to say (or what he did say today)?

Please

 

[ohiogirl]

I feel like I am on the jury with this one
It's like, someone, please just show me something one way or the other,
Make it be believable,
Quit arguing routers and mtf's and give me a direction

the jury must be frustrated