sunshine05
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2011
- Messages
- 1,914
- Reaction score
- 1
Sorry for the late post. Guess where I was?
I have this to say:
1) We either MAY have a smoking gun or we may have a flaming bag of dog poop on a front door while six kids hide in the bushes and giggle. And when I say six kids, I mean BOZ.
2) This could turn the tide and get the truth, but Houston, we have an issue.
3) Our problem is: We have told this jury several times that Cisco kept no records and had no way of knowing what could have/would have/should have been in BC's home on that evening. Now we are changing our tune REALLY late in the game. It sounds suspicious and kind of gives Kurtz some props inadvertently.
4) We are opening the door to GM. All kinds of things could go wrong there if he gets in on the router data.
5) I think you guys are misunderstanding where the defense is going with the "spoliage" idea. It's not to say: It didn't happen. It's to say: It's invalid and not to be used as evidence. (Boz is the one wanting "pristine" evidence with no highlighter, etc. But here's a router log and some FBI data with some poo on it.)
6) Has anyone realized that the use of the CTF Marshall/DPD guy is BECAUSE a) they didn't have the skills in the CPD and b) they had already screwed up other digital/technology based forensics?
Man, this just got fun! Go TEAM!!
johnfear - I really love your posts! They always make me smile. You have a way with words. Thank you.