CarolinaMoon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2008
- Messages
- 5,173
- Reaction score
- 126
Been watching and reading. I really understand what folks said about the PT today. Their "big" points needed a sharpener.
Why?Yes, they do.
glad I am out and can't watch this.
can't believe this PT is so weak. these are supposed to be the top 2...geez
He may walk because of their incompetence.
May/07, she gave description of customer - shirt, no coat, blond hair, blue jeans. That was only time she provided description to Spivey. She never gave another description ... didn't describe height, weight, lots or little hair, eye color, facial features ... never further described clothing. She also mentioned another person in store when customer cursed at her ... claimed it was a regular customer ...she said that regular customer discussed the curser with her ...
Why?
I doubt they will. The PT was weak wrt JY's prior testimony. So far I don't see a reason to put him back on the stand.
IMO
glad I am out and can't watch this.
can't believe this PT is so weak. these are supposed to be the top 2...geez
He may walk because of their incompetence.
I wouldnt put him on the stand!!!! moo
Sorry, I misunderstood the question to mean: does the defense have to put Jason on the stand to muffle the damage.I was responding to the post asking if the defense team was the one to put them on the stand, not the prosecution. In other words, the prosecution can't put him on the stand, the defense has to.
He doesn't HAVE to take the stand by any means. But only one side can do it.
There is no reason for him to take the stand now.
The Jurors saw him , the Pros blew it.
Doesn't the defense have to put him on the stand? thanks.
I think he did it. But now think he will get another hung jury.
The pros is out lawyered.
JMO