3. There is a mssing shirt supposedly but when I look at the video from the hotel I see 2 very different shirts being worn.
I've been wondering this as well. Why does no one mention this? According to the time stamps, these images were taken very close together, < 1 min. They have to be the same shirt, but they look completely different. Playing with both images I am unable to manipulate exposure or brightness settings to provide similar contrast as shown in hallway black shirt. Under no scenario, with any photo anywhere, am I able to manipulate a black shirt to appear lighter than a brown haired subject, as seen in the photo below.
![187259-Image41-640x480.jpg](/forums/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fwwwcache.wral.com%2Fasset%2Fspecialreports%2Fmichelleyoung%2F2011%2F06%2F14%2F9726962%2F187259-Image41-640x480.jpg&hash=3f3dfeb7cf7876ced5f00350033b1f34)
All images contain data that indicate they have been extensively processed with some type of image-editing software.
Searching Compression Signatures: (3327 built-in, 0 user(*) )
EXIF.Make / Software EXIF.Model Quality Subsamp Match?
------------------------- ----------------------------------- ---------------- --------------
CAM:[SONY ] [CYBERSHOT U ] [ ] Yes
SW :[Adobe Photoshop 7.0 ] [Save As 07 ]
SW :[Apple Quicktime ] [0466-0467 ]
SW :[Digital Photo Professiona] [05 ]
SW :[IJG Library ] [075 ]
SW :[MS Paint ] [ ]
SW :[MS Visio ] [ ]
SW :[ZoomBrowser EX ] [low ]
The following IJG-based editors also match this signature:
SW :[GIMP ] [075 ]
SW :[IrfanView ] [075 ]
SW :[idImager ] [075 ]
SW :[FastStone Image Viewer ] [075 ]
SW :[NeatImage ] [075 ]
SW :[Paint.NET ] [075 ]
SW :[Photomatix ] [075 ]
SW :[XnView ] [075 ]
NOTE: JFIF COMMENT field is known software
Based on the analysis of compression characteristics and EXIF metadata:
ASSESSMENT: Class 1 - Image is processed/edited