Actually, an analysis of her statement under "hypnosis" is probably useless. First, the chances of her actually being in a trance state when she knows she has to lie and cover up the disappearance of a child are zero, zip, nada. Statement analysis will reveal linguistic areas that indicate deception, e.g., the large font area of her statement "did you see the AC guy...?" But because she is supposedly under hypnosis, the best we could do is compare this statement to the other statements that she has made about the same time period. Nothing in this version makes a lick of sense. The word "see" might refer to whether Ron knew the AC guy was there before he left. Why would she need to hand Ron the phone if both Ron and the AC guy are in the trailer? The AC guy's testimony would almost certainly clear this up.
What this transcript of the hypnosis tape tells me is that the tape is as nonsensical as the rest of her story. These details will never line up with other versions of the story because the lies at the heart of the story require other lies. All this statement would do is suggest that an LE interviewer should go over the timeline, again and again and test it against actual physical evidence (pings on the cell phone, landline phone records, the testimony of the AC man). I am sure that LE has already done that.
One telling point about both Misty and Joe: They said they didn't do "it." So there is an "it" that they know about and so are denying--which is odd since the rest of us have been trying to figure out what happened to Haleigh and thus don't know what "it" is.