From Dr. Ford's testimony the atmosphere of life in the DC suburbs in summertime seems a life of days swimming at the country club and a lot of parties. While criticism includes the professor's inconsistencies in memory, ie; the layout of the house but not the address or whose house it was, I am wondering in this context if memories of these summers, lots of parties, beach parties, random houses, underage drinking runs on in a blur.
Is it possible that it's the two boys who if so inebriated, do not remember, that they honestly meant no harm, that they got out of hand and incontrollable when drinking? It's possible... Imo...
I'm not excusing this type of attack, ever, but what was considered "the norm" for out of control parties with teens? A blur of teenagers, spontaneous gatherings, and drinking? --Mark Judge outlines some of this in his books.
I remember how spontaneous my teenage years were. Different generation. Illicit drugs much more prevalent than alcohol in my earlier gen... Plus, socioeconomic circles dictate lifestyle, too.
I've seen teens drunk out of their minds at some weddings. They don't handle alcohol well.
So, my feeling is wondering about intent, while inebriated. Inhibitions can be really tricky. As can memory.
Both Ford and Kavanaugh have presented compelling testimony. No easy answers.
It does occur to me that if Kavanaugh knowingly knew he did this, had intended harm, he would have withdrawn.
I do believe Professor Ford. And I tend to think that as rowdy teenagers some boys might not have realized their behavior is not one size fits all. It's as subjective as what is a lifelong trauma for one is no big deal for another.
--jmo