I was speaking specifically to LE procedures. Since you brought it up though, I think that's a bit of a generalization of Mrs. Wetterling's position. From everything I've heard her say on the subject, she's trying to make the point that not everyone who is a registered sex offender is cut from the same cloth, and some of these people shouldn't even be on the registry at all. The system that she had a hand in creating is being used in ways that she never intended.
As for the reintegration into society, I believe she is asserting that, if certain offenders are going to be released back into the general population, do we want to create an environment which puts up so many barriers that they are likely to reoffend? Or, should we step back and try and removed a bit of emotion from the equation, and try to do everything in our power to decrease the risk of people being sexually assaulted. This can be labeled as being "soft" on sex offenders (which some have accused her and others of being) but I believe her only intention, and main motivation, is to stop as many fututre incidents as possible. Looking at every sex offender in a one-dimensional manner does not help to achieve this. That doesn't forgive them of their crime, or lessen the revulsion attached to certain crimes, it simply takes into account the reality of the situation. Just my humble opinion!