prolificProfile88
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2016
- Messages
- 14
- Reaction score
- 1
A lot of these men who contact these girls online or by phone, are probably obvious predators. I imagine LISK is very skilled in making these girls feel safe initially.
I had been looking at the escorts ads, too, but don't know what to look for. What's the common denominator (besides sex) that LISK chooses them for?
I do notice that a lot of the escorts on Backpage are very high-maintenance in appearance with a lot of make-up, breast implants, etc., and that LISK's victims were girls that looked more natural in their overall appearances.
A lot of these men who contact these girls online or by phone, are probably obvious predators. I imagine LISK is very skilled in making these girls feel safe initially.
I imagine LISK is very skilled in making these girls feel safe initially.
I don't think he would be that careless to post a add knowing his ip address can be tracked and knowing his computer files can be found I think he searches for those who he finds easy and weak because he likes to be in control he love the fact that there life's are in his hands and he can end it when ever he wants he is a very sick twisted saddest that has anger and resentment towards woman who knows maybe his mother was a prostitute and as a child he would see her with her clients maybe he was abused and he seeks woman who fit his mother's description and he kills them because he see's them as her you never know what runs threw the minds of someone so sick as he is all you can do is hope he stays on neutral
I was thinking why would anyone leave home wo your cell ?! To me that just sounds fishy if the "date" I was going on asks me not to take it . Unless he was posing as or is someone in office or a high ranking public official who makes it a point to stress he can't take a chance of having his pic taken while rendezvousing . Like that is prob the only situation I wouldn't find as odd if I was asked to keep my phone home.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
(Subscribing)
I was just asking of there was a thread like this because I was wondering if anyone had crosschecked the $1500 figure.
Beginning in 2011 a number of legal challenges were initiated by foes of Backpage in attempts to eliminate the adult section of the website and or shut down the website entirely. These actions included legislative initiatives as well as lawsuits brought by individuals; all of these lawsuits, which were mostly brought by politicians and NGOs, were successfully challenged by Backpage, which argued that the First Amendment protections of free speech were being compromised by any restriction on postings by individuals on the Backpage website. The Fifth and Fourteenth amendments to the Constitution as well as the Commerce Clause were also cited as reasons that these efforts were illegal under US law. Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (CDA) served as an additional cornerstone in this defense.
~~snip~~
On October 6, 2016 Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and California Attorney General Kamala Harris announced that Texas authorities had raided the company's Dallas headquarters and arrested CEO Carl Ferrer at the George Bush Intercontinental Airport in Houston on felony charges of pimping a minor, pimping, and conspiracy to commit pimping. Ferrer, who had flown from Amsterdam, is being held pending extradition to California. The California arrest warrant alleges that 99% of Backpage’s revenue was directly attributable to prostitution-related ads, and many of the ads involved victims of sex trafficking, including children under the age of 18. The State of Texas is also considering a money laundering charge pending its investigation.[53][54] The website's controlling shareholders, Michael Lacey and James Larkin, have also been charged with conspiracy to commit pimping and warrants have been issued for their arrest.