This is a terrible thought, however, how many mothers are willing to sexualize their daughters at the age of 3 or 4 or 5, etc.? What if Patsy "pimped out" her daughter? What if something happened that night with a "night time visitor"? Patsy did the pimping and then she had to cover up for the terrible damage done to her daughter because of Her actions. I know it sounds terrible, but.....
Hi Dutch, I'm sorry how I responded to you. To answer your question (and I am anti-*advertiser censored*, anti-prostitution, and anti-sexual exploitation). I think I was upset at how you only blamed the mother, and not the father.
I am not so sure if all those stories about the sexual predators getting near JB are true. That does NOT mean that they did not harm other children or adult women. Yes, I think they did harm other children and perhaps adult women.
Regarding Santa - I definitely do consider him to be a sexual predator. However, he is not a suspect because he was recovering from heart surgery. Plus he had several witnesses. Remember that just because there were LOTS of other sexual predators in the neighborhood doesn't mean that they necessarily hurt JB - but we also have to be concerned ABOUT THE OTHER VICTIMS, WHETHER THEY ARE OTHER CHILDREN OR ADULT WOMEN.
There are several issues with your assumptions: 1) John was very controlling, so if they were pimping out JB, we would also have to hold John the father also responsible. Surely, he would know what was going on. John masterminded everything, so he would have to be held responsible; 2) It's unlikely that Patsy could chase a sexual predator out of the house. It would be more likely that he would flee once he saw an adult women. Patsy was a fairly small woman. 3) A routine "sexual predator" would not have interest in framing the mother. He would have interest in framing the father.
Also, due to John the father being very controlling and masterminding everything, he would have to also be held accountable, if your suspicions were true.
Now, I am very anti-*advertiser censored* and anti-prostitution. But pedophile rings and *advertiser censored* rings and human trafficking do TARGET upper-middle class women and children, but not generally children from WEALTHY families. Maybe I should NOT mention this, since there are always exceptions. But my assumptions is that the neighborhood had a lot of sexual abusers (of both children and adult women), but they did not necessarily target either JB or Burke. Maybe I am saying that just because they did NOT abuse JB or Burke, that we should still hold them accountable for crimes against other children?
Lastly, John's business had very dubious connections and dealings. Supposedly the company dealt in computer software, but that may have been a front. Was it involved in *advertiser censored* rings and money laundering? And if so, those would have ties to drug dealing and organized crime. But it's also possible that what I have read about the company is totally false. Maybe it's part of John's narrative to shift blame somewhere else.
One of the problems with shifting the blame onto pedophile rings and child *advertiser censored* and human trafficking is this: John the father and John Andrew are purposely promoting these scenarios. They want to shift the blame onto pedophile rings, *advertiser censored* rings, prostitution rings - plus also onto Pasty, the mother, and Burke (JB's 9-year-old brother). Could Burke have committed sexual assault and murder? Yes, but he would not be mature enough to frame the mother.
So, we must always be aware that John the father is pushing this narrative.
I'm in Canada and a Liberal (social democrat actually). Politics in Canada are far less polarized than in the United States and Canada. So this provides me with a balanced perspective. I am able to oppose child exploitation without a political agenda.(We do NOT have the Qanon theory in Canada. In fact, conspiracy theories are NOT popular in Canada.)
An example of a balanced perspective is that I do think pedophile rings and human traffickers (of adult women as well) did circulate in the Ramseys circle (not so much from the beauty pageants, though they do attract pedophiles, but FROM JOHN'S BUSINESS CONNECTIONS AND DEALINGS), but I doubt that Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell were involved. It would be a mistake to not acknowledge other evil individuals as well.
In this case, I doubt the beauty pageants had anything to do with JB's sexual abuse and murder. (Remember that Burke was not in beauty pageants, and I suspect that he was also sexually abused.)
Though I do oppose beauty pageants, and they are NOT a part of Canadian culture. (We have a Miss Canada pageant, but most Canadians are not aware of this.)
So, given the two motives of 1) silencing JB so that she could not report PRIOR abuse; and 2) framing the mother:
John the father and John Andrew had those two motives. Perhaps they worked together? If so, John the father probably gave the mother a sedative so that she would sleep soundly that night.
It's also important to acknowledge that this was a premeditated murder, not an accident.
Don't worry: John and/or John Andrew will be arrested, charged and convicted! Remember that John Ramsey is getting older now. What if he has an operation and is given anaesthesia? He might let the truth out. Please correct me if I am wrong about anaesthesia, and letting the truth slip out.
