MaxManning
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2015
- Messages
- 1,438
- Reaction score
- 8
Just want to throw this out there since SD and Bobby are mentioned in a theory.
The bon fire.
In the dassey trial, brendan notes that there was lumber scraps left over from the building of the Janda garage. Who built the garage ? Tadych involved maybe, since he's the boyfriend ?
Why does a bon fire get made that day in particular is the question. We obviously see that the contention is that it's to burn a body.
But does it change the perspective at all if Scott Tadych says to Steve at some point or even through Barb Janda - suggests a bon fire that day to get rid of all that scrap lumber ?
Putting tires on a fire seems crazy to me, because bon fires that I have been a part of are a social event and not about destroying anything.
We don't use tires or car seats as accelerants to speed up destruction. We usually put more thought to making it last!
But at a junk yard, and in rural areas, they are most often about destroying things and not uncommon. The goal in these bon fires is typically to go as fast as possible and get the WORK done.
So is tires and seats as accelerants seen as anything but business as usual to me ? nope.
So is it important how the bon fire comes about ? Who makes that decision ? Was it possible that Steve was not KNOWINGLY the origins of the bon fire ? But someone like Barb said , hey steve, I got all this scrap lumber that needs burning, is it possible you can burn it tonight ? Might that be something Scott asks her to ask Steve ?
How would we ever know? Also, it's true that Steve manufacturing a reasonable reason is just as plausible - ie, hey, let me help you out with all that scrap lumber barb. etc.
So knowing how this bon fire was decided upon, is of interest to me.
The bon fire.
In the dassey trial, brendan notes that there was lumber scraps left over from the building of the Janda garage. Who built the garage ? Tadych involved maybe, since he's the boyfriend ?
Why does a bon fire get made that day in particular is the question. We obviously see that the contention is that it's to burn a body.
But does it change the perspective at all if Scott Tadych says to Steve at some point or even through Barb Janda - suggests a bon fire that day to get rid of all that scrap lumber ?
Putting tires on a fire seems crazy to me, because bon fires that I have been a part of are a social event and not about destroying anything.
We don't use tires or car seats as accelerants to speed up destruction. We usually put more thought to making it last!
But at a junk yard, and in rural areas, they are most often about destroying things and not uncommon. The goal in these bon fires is typically to go as fast as possible and get the WORK done.
So is tires and seats as accelerants seen as anything but business as usual to me ? nope.
So is it important how the bon fire comes about ? Who makes that decision ? Was it possible that Steve was not KNOWINGLY the origins of the bon fire ? But someone like Barb said , hey steve, I got all this scrap lumber that needs burning, is it possible you can burn it tonight ? Might that be something Scott asks her to ask Steve ?
How would we ever know? Also, it's true that Steve manufacturing a reasonable reason is just as plausible - ie, hey, let me help you out with all that scrap lumber barb. etc.
So knowing how this bon fire was decided upon, is of interest to me.