sorrell skye
Former Member
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2009
- Messages
- 6,684
- Reaction score
- 7,007
We don't really know what they heard at all, considering the idea that they supposedly heard "noises" is coming from DB, it's hearsay, and not a first hand account.
For all anyone knows, the boys didn't hear any clicking (or any other sounds, for that matter). It's possible this is the reason DB doesn't want them to be re-interviewed by LE - because they may have heard nothing at all.
Who does it benefit & what scenario does it support when DB claims the boys heard "noises"?
Oh, but wait -
Who does it benefit when DB refuses to allow LE to re-interview the boys, and possibly question them about the "noises" she claims they heard?
The same answer applies to both questions.
Until I hear from LE that the boys reported in their 1st interview with investigators that they heard "noises" (clicking or otherwise), I'll remain skeptical.