Good point, I guess that JOHN didn't think of THAT!!
And what about John saying the suitcase shouldn't be there?
Good point, I guess that JOHN didn't think of THAT!!
And what about John saying the suitcase shouldn't be there?
We can add the suitcase to the list then...the nightgown, the Kleenex box, the bowl, the pineapple, the spoon, the flashlight, the chair in front of the train room door, BR on the 911 tape, the dead daughter in the basement.....
all the above "weren't supposed to be there/happen".
I have a thread over at Forums For Justice...(FFJ)...and its titled JR's interview, things that were out of place"...I copied and pasted parts of his interview, where he said that things were out of place...and yes, the suitcase was one of them. I also did the same for Patsy's interview. I am now counting how many "I Don't Knows"...and "I can't remembers"...are in Patsy's interview. She also said and "Blah, blah, blah"...and "la de da de da" alot...and I am counting those too. I am almost finished, so I will post the results when I am done. It just takes a long time to get through 400 plus pages of her interview.
that should be interesting! I bet the times she was confronted on anything could be counted on one hand.
When you get it done, maybe you could post it here, Ames!
Yep, if you only have about three fingers on one hand. LOL
yep,you could even cut a few fingers off,and it would still work.LOL.
...LOL.....sad but true!! I only have less than 200 more pages to go through, until I post my findings. Did you know that when Patsy is telling the story about JB being hit in the face, by Burke...with the golf club...that she says that "JonBenét screamed BLOODY MURDER"....? I just thought that was a poor choice of words, considering the circumstances.
With this chair story in JR's interviews, he concocted a scenario in which both the imaginery intruder and himself touched that chair . Perhaps he did so in case kind of finger print or brown fibers from gloves for instance would be detected linking himself and the intruder to the chair.
Chair detail was added for a reason imo which makes me think he did actually carry that chair but not behind the train room but behind the winecellar door.
The authors of the Craven Silence series have a website for additional information. One of the pages has some of the info about the knife:I know some people thought the pocket knife was found in the WC, but as I remember, it was found outside the WC. I'll have to look it up again.
Not sure if the image showed up for everyone. I'll try again. If it doesn't show up again, the link to it is found here:(sbm)This is a Prusik Hitch:
(rsbm)The authors of the Craven Silence series have a website for additional information. One of the pages has some of the info about the knife:
https://shakedowntitle.com/2016/12/07/jonbenet-ramsey-case-insights-1-burkes-knife/
[CAVEAT: Unless it is sourced, not all of the info is necessarily correct. For example, they state that the "knot" tied on the paintbrush is a Prusic Hitch. It is NOT a Prusik Hitch, regardless of who or how many people say it is. This is a Prusik Hitch:
![]()
Well in this instance BR never bothered using the hook thing did he?BURKE: That one has a big knife, small knife, saw, corkscrew, screwdriver, flat head screwdriver, toothpick and tweezers. And I think thats it. And then I have another one that has a saw, scissors, its got this little hook thing that you tie knots better with. Um, I said saw? A cork opener.
(rsbm)The authors of the Craven Silence series have a website for additional information. One of the pages has some of the info about the knife:
https://shakedowntitle.com/2016/12/07/jonbenet-ramsey-case-insights-1-burkes-knife/
[CAVEAT: Unless it is sourced, not all of the info is necessarily correct. For example, they state that the "knot" tied on the paintbrush is a Prusic Hitch. It is NOT a Prusik Hitch, regardless of who or how many people say it is. This is a Prusik Hitch:
![]()
I agree with your opinion on that, BB. That's the reason I added my caveat. I was only supplying the link because it has some useful info about the knife/knives all on the one page. Their conclusions/opinions shouldn't be necessarily taken at face value.Shakedown as a source is iffy at best.
Nor did the AR itemize any manual strangulation wounds on her neck, fingernail scratches above the ligature, or injuries to her frenulum or nasal septum . That doesn't prevent some from speculating about things that might have been done that would be expected to leave an injury (e.g., manual strangulation, victim struggling with ligature, smothering with a pillow, etc.). No, I don't think anyone suspects she was stabbed with a knife -- only that it might have been used somehow during commission of the crime(s).The autopsy report did not itemize any knife wounds on JonBenet.
(rsbm)Nor did the AR itemize any manual strangulation wounds on her neck, fingernail scratches above the ligature, or injuries to her frenulum or nasal septum . That doesn't prevent some from speculating about things that might have been done that would be expected to leave an injury (e.g., manual strangulation, victim struggling with ligature, smothering with a pillow, etc.). No, I don't think anyone suspects she was stabbed with a knife -- only that it might have been used somehow during commission of the crime(s).