lisasalinger
Juror13
- Joined
- May 13, 2011
- Messages
- 1,602
- Reaction score
- 14
Is the dark wood bedroom door a closet that was in the hallway to bathroom?
I think that is a very good possibility. Here is a photo of that area
Is the dark wood bedroom door a closet that was in the hallway to bathroom?
I think that is a very good possibility. Here is a photo of that area
I'm trying to figure out which door this is that has this damage. This image was flashed very briefly while they were talking about the bedroom door, but the color looks darker than the bedroom door that has the hole in it.
Also, it's too big of a piece to be part of the bashed bathroom door.
Check it out and let me know what you think:
Check out my post # 108 on the previous page to see the other photos of the bedroom door. The bedroom door looks to me to be a little bit lighter in color plus it has panels similar to the bathroom door.
This darker brown door with the crack in it appears to be flat.
It could just be the angle & lighting of the photo that is throwing me off, but from comparing the photos, it looks like a different door or cabinet all together.
This is where the defense are saying that their experts found a new bat mark on the door.
Regarding the bolded phrase, that's precisely why a thread is dedicated to the topic, so to allow for a more focused discussion.How does the door the crucial evidence in OP's trial became a new topic, the sooner both threads are merged the better
"IMO Roux was being tricky and trying to make it seem like the seal pattern was disturbed by the way he asked the questions and demonstrated the pictures."
Yes, exactly. And actually, he is quite skilled at what he does, no? He uses not only his actual questions, but he also uses his voice tone, his facial expressions, even his body language. I am sure I would be quite intimidated by him in a courtroom!
I've only ever had to testify once in court and it was NOT about murder - it was in a civil trial - and I was pretty nervous, especially at first.
They have to prove that the bat would not have reached this height if OP was really on his stumps as the prosecution alleges.
Listening to Van Resenberg's testimony again - I do not believe that the door seal was broken and compromised, as I originally thought. Roux was merely demonstrating that Col V didn't notice the change in tape patters from one pic to the next, but I believe the two tape patterns were different days.
IMO Roux was being tricky and trying to make it seem like the seal pattern was disturbed by the way he asked the questions and demonstrated the pictures.
Regarding the locked and battered bedroom door - is there any possibility Reeva locked OP out, and, failing to break through, he used the ladders left outside to climb in through the balcony windows? If he took her by surprise she might not have had time to unlock the door again and escape, hence the fleeing to the toilet? Maybe that's what inspired him with the intruder/ladder scenario.......
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...hotographs-Reeva-Steenkamp.html#ixzz2vrt9C81m