ITA. A Ramsey "familiar with forensics" (as UK Guy surmised) would not have had a need to wipe the flashlight simply for the purpose of removing fingerprints. They would have wanted to remove any other traces of evidence they thought specifically related to the crime: hair, fibers, wine cellar/floor dust/debris, glass shard dust, etc?
So, which Ramsey would have been most likely, under the circumstances at the time, to be the one to think like that?
Well you already know what theory of the case I subscribe to so if I reply JR you won't be surprised.
I long ago settled on the FL as the most probable weapon (with respect to otg who's done an enormous amount of work on the topic) I was just in the "neighborhood" so to speak, looking for some data from an old post. Thought I'd make a comment or two and say hi. Hi MWM.