lonetraveler
Crime Addict
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2008
- Messages
- 17,582
- Reaction score
- 45,738
Does anyone know if this hearing is being televised anywhere or tweeted? I really would like to see, hear or read a play by play. TIA.
Is anyone following this? I am amazed at all the testimony saying he threatened her. I am appalled at all that his fellow law enforcement officers let slide. They can be held partially to blame for Kathleen's death, imo. Also, Stacy's, as he would not have been able to kill her if he was punished for Kathleen's murder, imo again.
Please if anyone of you are every in a domestic violence situation with LE, please do not give up reporting. Scream it as loud as you can, as often as you can, until someone hears you.
Is anyone following this? I am amazed at all the testimony saying he threatened her. I am appalled at all that his fellow law enforcement officers let slide. They can be held partially to blame for Kathleen's death, imo. Also, Stacy's, as he would not have been able to kill her if he was punished for Kathleen's murder, imo again.
Please if anyone of you are every in a domestic violence situation with LE, please do not give up reporting. Scream it as loud as you can, as often as you can, until someone hears you.
So yeah, the "Drew's Law" is 'fine just fine' if it puts him away...
But what happens later... way past Drew Peterson?
It is a bad law.
Robert Deel said he had been handling crime scene investigations for about one year when he was called to Savio's Bolingbrook house in the overnight hours of March 1, 2004. He said he did not test for the presence of unseen blood in the bathroom, collect a blood sample from the tub, dust for fingerprints and did not take into evidence a glass of orange juice in the kitchen or a bottle of cleaning fluid on a dresser in Savio's bedroom.
"There wasn't really anything to look for," he said of evidence in the bathroom.
Savio's fingernail clippings -- sometimes a source of crime scene DNA -- were never tested, Deel said.
Deel said he also did not notice that night any of the documented injuries Savio suffered, but said it would not have changed his investigation.
"The bruises on the body are insignificant to me," he said.
http://www.chicagobreakingnews.com/...sons-answers-about-savio-seemed-scripted.html
Deel also testified that after Stacy Peterson's disappearance in 2007, he was asked by Will County prosecutors to never again process a crime scene in their county.
Reading this article posted in media by Angel all I can say is just wow! I mean WOW!
What would have been "significant to this guy? Would a confession have even changed his mind?
Later in the article he also says this:
I haven't seen any reports of his testimony yet. Do you have a link?
What do you all think about Ric M's testimony? I remember him telling us that the only money he received for talking with the press, was enough money to pay off his phone bill. And the story he is telling now doesn't sound like the stories he told here.