PrincessSezMe
Rest in Peace
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2012
- Messages
- 2,112
- Reaction score
- 2
Nancy finally lost the little girl barrette tonight. Maybe she isn't letting her little daughter dress her anymore :giggle:.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wait, BK just said that one of the defense witnesses is most likely going to claim that JA suffered from PTSD after killing Travis. Well of course she is, but how can that be? I thought the jury asked JA if she had been diagnosed or sought medical treatment for a medical/mental condition. JA answered no. Wouldn't PTSD fall under the mental health category?
Well, of course the 62 sec. is true, because the photos prove it. My point was that JA's version of events is impossible...I believe that the whole thing took 62 sec. is true because she had the gun and knife with her. She watched him die slowly.
OK! Here's what happened:
The shelf that I put my foot on was approximately 12 inches from the ground ...
I stepped on the very edge of it while at the same time grabbing the higher shelf with my left as though I was reaching for something higher and to my right.... the back side of it tipped up and then landed back on its pegs only slightly (but definitely) disturbing the shoes on it.
Here's what I was totally NOT expecting to happen (because I suck at physics)... The shelf I grabbed with my hand SLID out towards me really fast and cleared the back peg platforms and fell down between the 4 pegs and the shoes landed on the shelf below it!!!
Great post! Make:seeya:s lots of sense to me:goodpost:
I vote we add a couple more:
8) after 18 loooong days, the DT has established exactly ZERO to suggest self defense
and
9) hearing JM use the F word causes massive intermittent tingling sensations in the extremities.
Nancy finally lost the little girl barrette tonight. Maybe she isn't letting her little daughter dress her anymore :giggle:.
As others have said, this is a Death Penalty trial. If JA is sentenced to death, there is an automatic appeal (and there will prolly be an appeal if she is sentenced to LWOP).
Pinch me. This must be a dream! :great:
Wait, BK just said that one of the defense witnesses is most likely going to claim that JA suffered from PTSD after killing Travis. Well of course she is, but how can that be? I thought the jury asked JA if she had been diagnosed or sought medical treatment for a medical/mental condition. JA answered no. Wouldn't PTSD fall under the mental health category?
Jody Arias goes to her bishop AFTER the murder and admits the sex. So now she's in the process of repentence without confessing that SHE MURDERED SOMEONE!
This reveals part of her motive, which was to restore her good name and smear Travis' because he threatened to expose her for the beeyotch *advertiser censored* thief? that she is. She fully intended to keep this murder secret forever.
If she went back to the bishop and told him that she murdered someone after she confessed that she slept with him--and didn't tell him that--she would be excommunicated.
I am sure she fooled the bishop, crying and carrying on that she didn't want to do the nasty but he made her and now he's dead and he was so wonderful, kind, lit up a room...I'm sue the bishop felt sorry for her almost-widowhood and just put her on probation.
What a monster.
Trust me he will manage to throw in some sex in there :floorlaugh:I wonder if Nurmi will start his questioning of expert witnesses with, "So, how would you describe your childhood?"
... her strategy is "baffle them with BS."
I tried to quote you on the last thread but the thread closed. I was going to warn you NOT to do this experiment since I did it in real life and the outcome wasn't good. At least you were prepared by WS members and Mr. Martinez. JA's version of events is not possible. I'm sure most of the jurors have had these types of shelves in their lives and will know it's impossible to climb these types of shelves. Thanks for taking one for the team. :rocker:
Is it a classic sign of "battered woman syndrome" to fantasize about being ravished by the boyfriend who previously raped her? Is it typical for such women to write in their private journals about enthusiastically acting out their sexual fantasies with the abusers who raped them previously (anally raped on her baptism but later talks about how she and Travis fulfilled each others naughty fantasies together and expresses how much she loves him)?
I'm a newbie here, so...sorry if I'm out of line, but for those who believe JM did not score some severely major points today, I have to respectfully disagree. First, cross examination is about keeping the witness unstable and off-guard; the whole point is to not let the witness prepare for her answers. So, if you noticed, JM was moving from topic to topic without any transitions...lack of organization is completely by design to keep JA off-guard. Second, cross (or in this case follow-up) is not about landing the ultimate "Perry Mason" moment. Rather, it is about gathering inconsistencies to be argued in closing argument.
So, today we learned:
1. That Jodi said last week that she thought the gun was in a holster, but today....she suddenly can't remember.
2. The 62 second timeline is impossible.
3. No reasonable person could believe that she climbed on the closet shelves without disturbing anything, or flipping one of the shelves.
4. She saw the gun three times: but, none of those times included seeing Travis "load the gun and take it with him." Today was the first time we heard this claim.
5. She remembers, crystal clear, only the events that support her self-defense claims. 6. The height of the closet will not support her version (IMO demonstrated clearly on closing).
7. She only uses Mormon doctrine when it demonstrates that Travis was a heretic.
There are more points that were made, but I thought today was the best day JM had so far. IMHO, at the end of the day, some of the subtle points of today will bite JA in the behind more than any of the obvious inconsistencies.
Please pardon the pretension of my first post, but I am an avid follower of this trial and have been a consistent lurker here!
Isn't that the slogan on Nurmi's business card?
Wouldn't surprise me if he DIDNT ask if she was molested with a wooden spoon! Any excuse to talk sex Sex sex sex and more sex! I hope he lets wilma have her turn.:seeya:It sure will not be Mike from FineWoodWorking.....
Not looking forward to the "battered woman syndrome" experts taking the stand.