Now they are saying that they RETESTED the panties DNA. Where did the tights come from??? I could have sworn I heard tights, not just here but on the news.
According to MSNBC she had been redressed into the leggings/tights.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Now they are saying that they RETESTED the panties DNA. Where did the tights come from??? I could have sworn I heard tights, not just here but on the news.
According to MSNBC she had been redressed into the leggings/tights.
They matched the DNA from the skin cells on the tights to the DNA in her underwear. They then ruled out all family members and investigators. They have no idea who the DNA belongs too.
Wow! I never thought we'd get new info on this case. I need to rethink everything now.
Dr Baden is being interviewed saying that its a big leap to jump from what they have found to excluding anybody. He said something about DNA from the cleaners being found on the clothes many years ago?? So to proceed with caution.
And it took them how many years to determine this having had the tights and the undies since her murder...???... So much for modern technology and scientific research!
But doesn't the panty DNA match the tights DNA?? I believe that is what I'm understanding. Am I wrong?
On Fox here they are saying its some kind of new Touch technology, when someone touches something (in this case her clothes) that they are able to lift DNA from that and that it matches the DNA that was taken in 1997
But doesn't the panty DNA match the tights DNA?? I believe that is what I'm understanding. Am I wrong?
Dr Baden is being interviewed saying that its a big leap to jump from what they have found to excluding anybody. He said something about DNA from the cleaners being found on the clothes many years ago?? So to proceed with caution.
But doesn't the panty DNA match the tights DNA?? I believe that is what I'm understanding. Am I wrong?
I thought they ALWAYS said it was male DNA?
Found on waistband on leggings? Oh okay, so when she was "redressed" the waistband would come in contact with the panties, correct?
IMO, Mary Lacy just wanted to be rid of this once and for all.
Maybe I'm not understanding that, but wouldn't that mean the DNA could have come from any investigator or technician who ever handled the evidence?
Dr Baden is being interviewed saying that its a big leap to jump from what they have found to excluding anybody. He said something about DNA from the cleaners being found on the clothes many years ago?? So to proceed with caution.