Where are the arrests from TGJ indictment???
What in the world is going on???
Is there new evidence???
Justice for JonBenet!
A D.A. is not compelled to hold a grand jury by law. He can indict and arrest without one.
A D.A. controls the grand jury for the most part. In Colorado, what the grand jury does is sealed for all time...except in gossip circles and maybe the occasional grand juror appearing on a documentary of Larry Schiller's talking about it and having no consequences in spite of all Hunter's previous threats.
Team Ramsey in fact have been "gossiping" for a very long time about the grand jury NOT indicting anyone, or voting NOT to indict the Ramseys. Since we won't ever see that officially confirmed or denied, they can "gossip" all they want about it. Unfortunately, the media, lazy or corrupt as ever, took that "gossip" and then proceeded to repeat it as fact in almost every report I've seen since, with the rare exception. The truth is we don't know officially what the grand jury did, just what Team Ramsey want us to believe.
A grand jury in fact has these choices, led by the D.A.: they can be instructed by the D.A. not to vote at all, just do their job as an "investigative" body to compel witnesses to come forward and be questioned under oath, without their lawyers present, by the way, and to subpoena evidence, etc.; the grand jury can vote to indict one or more persons; the grand jury can vote not to indict anyone; or the grand jury can write a "report", and since I've never seen one written by a grand jury, I don't know what that would entail exactly, but we can guess.
Another rumor is that Hunter instructed the grand jury not to vote at all, and no report was written. So you can see that gossip goes the gamut. I don't believe we really know what they did.
But I do know what Dr. Henry Lee wrote in his book which had a chapter on the JB case: he stated his advice to Hunter after the grand jury was NOT to indict anyone, because Dr. Lee said he didn't believe the case was ready to win in court and as we know, double jeopardy would apply if the verdict was "not guilty." So it sounds to me like Dr. Lee was implying the grand jury voted to indict someone. But that's just a guess, because it also could simply imply that there was no grand jury vote and Hunter was making up his mind on his own.
Ultimately, Caplis also just repeated gossip. Since we have that gossip going both ways, I take it all with a grain of salt.
The bottom line is even if the grand jury did VOTE TO INDICT, that's the D.A.'s decision. We know Hunter would never in a million years want the unethical things he did in office during this investigation to come to light, and in my mind, that's true with Lacy. However happy their actions made Ramsey supporters, in the legal community they effectively destroyed any opportunity for anyone to ever be charged and convicted of this murder.
So no one was indicted by any D.A. and probably no one ever will be, IMO. Not without a confession and some evidence/info only the killer could have.
