I have a question that might seem foolish to some, but I'm going to ask it anyway
![Smile :) :)]()
Does everyone agree that the person or persons involved in the abduction (and probable murder) of The Springfield Three more than likely had done something like this before 1992 and probably has done this again? What I mean is, this kind of thing isn't a once in a lifetime kind of crime. It takes a certain kind of person to do this and those kind of people usually do it more than once. Am I right or just misguided?
There was a guy that I knew in Nashville that was a serial rapist (but of course, I didn't know until he was arrested) that became more and more violent with his victims as time went on. After reading about how his acts of aggression escalated, it really made me feel that he was on the verge of transitioning from a serial rapist to a serial killer. He also didn't choose his victims based on age, they're ages ranged from 14 - 60 and he even raped a pregnant woman and also raped a mother and her daughter. He left his DNA at the scene of one rape and detectives followed him, waited for him to eat dinner at a restaurant, took his silverware and got his DNA that way...just on a hunch and BOOM - they got their man! I wish this could happen in this case...wouldn't that be so awesome! edited to add: He didn't leave his DNA at the scene of a rape, his victim bit part of his finger off and saved it!
It seems as though, maybe there was no DNA left at the scene on Delmar. It makes me think that everything happened elsewhere or outside of the house (at least).