To my knowledge, those fibers were not found on the ligature. Certainly not tied into the knots.
Well we'd need to be sure about that now that that claim has been made. Also you say nothing of the paint tray. I can't see how these fibers got into the paint tray if they came from JB's doll.
Well, the statement itself is kind of bad, but I suppose you could go either way. But when coupled with his earlier claim that they were there to solve this thing because the cops wouldn't, it becomes eerily similar to OJ Simpson claiming he wouldn't stop until he found the "real killers."
I don't think you can draw much of a conclusion from that one way or the other. Even if the Rs had spent all day and every day looking for the killer (which was not their job, by the way), someone would have said: "They were just trying to protect themselves."
You have a point about them not knowing what the lawyers were up to. But even then, one has to consider that they kept themselves willfully ignorant (which JR's own statements about how he never even read the reports they made seem to bear out!).
Again, I don't see what that proves.
In this country, we have something called "plausible deniability." It refers to the practice of willfully keeping oneself ignorant of the dirty tricks used by their underlings. That way, if those dirty tricks are found out, the person can say they didn't know and not really be lying. I'd like to ask JR myself. But I might ask a little too hard, if you get my meaning.
Again, I see nothing in that to prove anything one way or othe other, except that you seem to have it in for JR.
But WHY did the lawyers think they had to be protected? That was the whole point of me saying that even if you aren't guilty, a lawyer will defend you like you are, because most lawyers KNOW that a good percentage of the people who hire them ARE guilty.
With people like you around convinced of their guilt even though there is no smoking gun? ;-) Of course they needed protection. The first thing I'd do if I had money and was innocent is hire a lawyer for my family's protection. Is that so hard to understand?
And have you ever thought that if a lawyer can establish their innocence, then people might start to believe that there really is a perp out there after all?
So I see excellent reasons why they needed to hire lawyers, whether they were guilty or not, and personally I would regard them as complete and utter fools if they were innocent and hadn't.
The legal world is a mine-field. Even if you are innocent, you can inadvertently incriminate yourself.