Found it. Copied his words from the interview. Is this what you are referring to?
GEORGE ANTHONY: And I said, Really? She says, yes. I said, Interesting. And I just said, Hey, by the way, I said, I'm getting ready to rotate your mom's tires on her car. There's a little metal wedge that fits underneath your tires so your car doesn't rock back and forth. And I said, Well, I'd like to have it, so in case you're not here over the weekend, I'd like to be able to do it.
She was hesitant about letting me get in the car. And I said, Well, listen, I got an extra key. I'll just go get it. Well, she was adamant about -- about that.
VAN SUSTEREN: What, not letting you into the car?
GEORGE ANTHONY: Yes, didn't want me to get into the car to get the stuff out. Dad, I'll get it for you. Dad, I'll get it out. I said, It's no problem. I know where it's at. I'll get it, get it out and be done with it.
So as we're walking out through the garage, she's still telling me, Dad, I'll get it. Give me a minute, I'll get it. I said, Casey, I'm capable of reaching inside your car, and I got it. So -- and she opened up the trunk of the car...
Actually, the video differs in this way.....in the last statement in the video he states this.
So -- AS she opened up the trunk of the car...
I agree that the jury came up with the only verdict they could based on the prosecutions case.
I had some questions about GA's testimony.
His reasoning for getting in Casey's trunk was the tire wedge. I thought the entire "story" was bull. First, strange that the tire wedge would be in her car. I really doubt Casey would put it in her car. My bigger issue is GA NEVER mentioned the tire wedge again.
IMO, he lied. It was always about the gas cans. However, since he filed a police report about stolen gas cans when he knew Casey had them, he had to come up with some reason other than the gas cans.
As far as GA smelling decomp in the car. Again, I did not believe him. He NEVER testified to a "reaction" to the smell. His own testimony was he could smell it before he opened a door. When he opened the door, he NEVER testified to a physical reaction. Just a smell. Then he drove him with the windows "cracked." If the smell was that bad, how could you drive with the windows cracked and not at least gag? After he gets home, he went to work. Nothing about changing his clothes or showering before he went to work.
Everything I have ever heard about human decomposition is that it clings to everything. You don't just smell it. It gets in your hair, on your skin, in your clothes. Unlike other odors, decomp stays with you long after you are away from the odor.
During the trial, when TH"s were describing it, they all said the same thing. They do not even try to wash their clothes, they throw them away. Then immediately shower and shower and shower. They confirmed EVERYTHING I had thought.
IMO, GA lied about why he needed Casey to open her trunk and smelling human decomp. Why would he lie about something that would make Casey look bad? He definitely was not trying to protect Casey with those stories. So why lie?
IMO, the prosecution put too much faith in GA. They believed GA so they left too many unasked questions. Those unasked questions made me question him more. Maybe he did also retrieve the tire wedge. Maybe he did change his clothes and shower. By not asking those questions though, GA's credibility was severly damaged IMO.
IMO, that left two people who were lying over that 31 day period. However, only one of them was directly linked to habitually using the duct tape from June through August then lied, misdirected and/or evade answering the questions about the duct tape.
IMO, no problem answering questions that made his daughter look bad but would not answer questions that might make him look bad. Ironically, if he would have just answered the questions that might make him look bad, he would have been more credibile.