krkrjx
The answer is blowin' in the wind.
- Joined
- May 4, 2010
- Messages
- 13,230
- Reaction score
- 44,217
Two of the jurors have stated that because the prosecution did not prove time of death the jury instructions said that they could not convict.
But reality is that the jury instructions did not require any such thing!
It looks to me like the jurors hated George and went ahead and assumed that Baez's opening statement is what must have happened. There was absolutely no evidence presented at this trial of an accident, and certainly duct tape did not get on Caylee's skull by way of an accident. I will say I could accept not guilty on Murder One because premeditation is difficult to prove when cause of death is not known. However, there were two other felony charges that should have been given serious consideration. Twelve jurors could not possibly all believe Casey is innocent. Something else was going on in their minds, and I think it was $$$$$$.
But reality is that the jury instructions did not require any such thing!
It looks to me like the jurors hated George and went ahead and assumed that Baez's opening statement is what must have happened. There was absolutely no evidence presented at this trial of an accident, and certainly duct tape did not get on Caylee's skull by way of an accident. I will say I could accept not guilty on Murder One because premeditation is difficult to prove when cause of death is not known. However, there were two other felony charges that should have been given serious consideration. Twelve jurors could not possibly all believe Casey is innocent. Something else was going on in their minds, and I think it was $$$$$$.