debs
Former Member
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2008
- Messages
- 7,700
- Reaction score
- 7
elle, good posts. Say it was Tommy giving a tip early on instead of later on, wouldn't his wife Lindsay have some knowledge? Someone else having seen them? LE would want to corroborate this tip for sure.
I always believed LE was throwing that up against the wall to see if it would stick so to speak. I think LE operated on a erroneous theory from the first moments they arrived, and they are the ones that were putting that alledged tip out there to the public in hopes if their theory was correct, someone would have seen Misty that night outside of the home and report it. LE had to go public, using a "tip" as their excuse to say it to begin with.
When Tommy comes along months later and makes this claim, he still doesn't provide proof Misty wasn't there, therefore no corroboration for LE's theory concerning Misty being gone. Tommy say's "He knocked on the door and everything was dark and quiet". Which doesn't substantiate an eyewitness accounting that Misty wasn't there inside sleeping or refusing to go to the door.
IMO, I've often wondered and thought that LE was the one circulating the tip information that Misty left the home that night. To see if it would fly and come to fruition. It didn't, it bombed. Plan "B" when they got a family member into custody, they coerced Tommy into going along with the plan and theory to say he had been to the home that night along with what time he had been there, in hopes to break Misty and whoever might have been with here. Bombed again, didn't work. It took them several days to convince Tommy while incarcerated, high bond bail, to play along with the plan. Thus explaining too Lindsays long interviews too. But it failed. I don't think Misty was gone away from the home that night. We would already have some kind of proof by now.
Only fly in this ointment will be that Ronald's phone records confirm he called Tommy, Ronald has admitted calling Tommy but denies sending Tommy over to the MH.