Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
it's not a special type of drowning... rapid only means the death came quickly once the event began... like somebody might shoot themselves and die quickly vs bleeding to death... When my brother died in a car crash, his death was "instantaneous", he died on scene after the event the other passenger lived for almost an hour afterward and his death was classified as delayed
it's not a special type of drowning... rapid only means the death came quickly once the event began... like somebody might shoot themselves and die quickly vs bleeding to death... When my brother died in a car crash, his death was "instantaneous", he died on scene after the event the other passenger lived for almost an hour afterward and his death was classified as delayed
They and their colleagues know they’re innocent. They cover up the fact that he was chased her around the time she went missing. The police conclude it was an accident, too, and resist releasing anything that would make the tragedy any more of a public spectacle than it already is.
"Cover up" was a poor choice of words on my part. It's hard to imagine her staying there without having at least some innocent contact with the hotel staff. In my scenario, the hotel staff and police knew that Lam had innocent contact with hotel staff that could look suspicious. But police determined it was innocent. In my scenario, a staff member was chasing her shortly before she went missing. You're probably right that the police would have released that key fact if they knew it. In my scenario, someone from the staff chased her for a legitimate reason: she was in an employee-only area, and he needed to see her room key to make sure she was supposed to be there. But it was an innocent contact not directly related to her death. Her pursuer viewed this her behavior as something between annoying misbehavior and flirting, nothing to do with real crime. She was in a hyped-up "manic" state, viewing it as excitement for excitement's sake. Her death was an accident. The hotel staff and police saw no need to report that staff made contact with her shortly before the time she is thought, by best reckoning, to have died.^ The police would have known immediately if she was in contact with any hotel staff. The police had security camera footage -- not only inside the elevator -- but in the lobby, etc. If the police knew this from the get-go, they wouldn't have released the footage of EL in the elevator at all, weeks after she went missing, if they were simply going to cover anything up. There wasn't a cover-up; they released the video because they were desperate for info.
Hi! New to WS. I have always been interested in unsolved cases but now that I am at home every day due to COVID-19 shelter in place, I thought I would finally join a forum. With that, I would like to suggest a possibility that I have not seen proposed yet. There has been much discussion about how she got into the tank and why she was naked with her close in the tank. What if she went on the roof with someone (a bad someone in this scenario, maybe someone who lived there or a worker, what if they told her they like to go skinny dipping in a tank and asked her if she wanted to go with him. They went to the roof together, they took their clothes off and left them on top of tank, and get in together. Maybe he was planning on killing her the whole time or maybe it was a crime of passion or something accidental happened once in the tank together but he drowned her. He then got out and threw her clothes in to hide evidence. If the top was closed, obviously he closed it but if it was left open maybe he thought he heard someone and got out there before he closed it. It would explain how and why she got in the tank naked and why her clothes were in there too. If he was already playing fun cat and mouse games with her prior, it would explain the elevator video too. I could have been a 14th floor resident because her scent was picked up at a window on the 14th floor that leads to the roof, only a long-term resident or employee would know that..
Hi! New to WS. I have always been interested in unsolved cases but now that I am at home every day due to COVID-19 shelter in place, I thought I would finally join a forum. With that, I would like to suggest a possibility that I have not seen proposed yet. There has been much discussion about how she got into the tank and why she was naked with her close in the tank. What if she went on the roof with someone (a bad someone in this scenario, maybe someone who lived there or a worker, what if they told her they like to go skinny dipping in a tank and asked her if she wanted to go with him. They went to the roof together, they took their clothes off and left them on top of tank, and get in together. Maybe he was planning on killing her the whole time or maybe it was a crime of passion or something accidental happened once in the tank together but he drowned her. He then got out and threw her clothes in to hide evidence. If the top was closed, obviously he closed it but if it was left open maybe he thought he heard someone and got out there before he closed it. It would explain how and why she got in the tank naked and why her clothes were in there too. If he was already playing fun cat and mouse games with her prior, it would explain the elevator video too. I could have been a 14th floor resident because her scent was picked up at a window on the 14th floor that leads to the roof, only a long-term resident or employee would know that..