NavySubMom
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2010
- Messages
- 1,392
- Reaction score
- 50
Not sure it is possible to have had a seizure, be texting, on the computer and talking on her cell which it appears she was doing during the time of the drowning. I never got why those pings, texting info were not used in rebuttal to prove Caylee could not have drowned unless it was between her constant electronic activities which only slowed and was quiet after her father left for work????
I think TM has as good a chance as any to get money back. How many people are fed up with misuse of funds that have been donated to help the less fortunate??? jmo
I am just trying to figure out something she will come up with should she be made to speak and testify in ZFG and TES cases; the drowning, IMO, is not going to work for her. JB did state the drowning as fact, I earlier re-listened to his opening statement, as much as it pained me.
re: ZFG and TES, FCA stated her child was kidnapped and was MISSING at the time, .......I do know THAT, that is the crux of these 2 suits, but during the trial it was stated Caylee drowned on July 16, is FCA GOING TO STICK WITH THAT and DOES SHE HAVE TO STICK WITH THAT, is my question???????.
Now GA handing FCA a dead Caylee was denied by GA and FCA never spoke a word during her trial, so she will have some leeway there I think. IMO, she has to come up with something where she has no knowledge or recollection of anything that happened that day re: ZFG trial, or she is cooked. TES is a little different LEGALLY I think whether he showed up on his own, was called to come, or what FCA actually said to him. I will believe what TM says over FCA or CA ANYDAY, I am talking LEGALLY, what the law will say about it. FCA "spoke" publicly re; jailhouse tapes about ZFG. Only TM, FCA and probably CA/GA know what FCA said to TM, and of those 4 I will only believe TM.
Also, if you can pay enough $$ and find the right witness, or if a witness just wants the massive publicity, you can get a hired gun to say just about anything, testify to about anything, even though FCA has no medical records of actual seizures or mental health records of any kind for a Post Traumatic Stress Disorder or some such thing, but there might be some rare case of a one-time seizure or something that causes a black-out that SOME PAID WITNESS will testify to. I am not saying I BELIEVE any of what I am typing here, I am just trying to figure a way for FCA to get out of her culpability in these 2 lawsuits........... if she is made to speak in these depos and civil trials, she HAS to come up with SOMETHING that will work......... or she has to tell the truth, which I think is impossible.
Whether she is legally locked into the drowning re: JB's opening statement (I know, NOT actual EVIDENCE), and then the EVIDENCE JB presented during the trial regarding the alleged drowning..... will rest on legal precedence and all legal "stuff" and legal mumbo-jumbo I imagine.
There was that ~1hr timeframe later in the day on the 16th when all computer/phone/electronic activity as you say, ceased, .......she could say she was beamed up by an alien spacecraft during that time and they did medical experiments on her and erased her brain and now she cannot retain any memories at all of anything that happens in the present day, and then the next thing she remembers is she was sitting at her death penalty trial and has no memory of ANYTHING AT ALL....... :floorlaugh: I am sure JB could find an 'expert" witness who would testify to that, not sure if her new atty. Greene will go that far, or not, we will have to see.
IMO, MOO, etc.