Titanic tourist sub goes missing in Atlantic Ocean, June 2023 #4

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
But how did it work on Titan? Was this a device mounted on the inside hull? if so, where? Or was it a handheld device that could be handed around? At one point Nargeolet lets Polar Prince know that he is the now the once communicating. Does that mean there was a change in where people were sitting inside Titan? or did Stockton just have him take over the communicating? We know there has been some trouble in the messages getting through.
Sorry, don't know any of that.

I've been listening to the hearings on-and-off. Today the "scientific director" of OceanGate testified. He was asked about what he was told about the the hull's longevity. Rush told him the hull would last "indefinitely".

At 5:53:50.
 
Remember how James Cameron painted a picture of the last minutes before the implosion of panicked passengers desperate to surface as warning alarms sounded? Well…

The New York Times has an interesting article about that scenario now that testimony points to the dropping of two weights, each weighing 35 pounds, in order to slow the Titan’s descent to make a smoother ride.

The article is behind a paywall so I have to paraphrase. Both Cameron and James Ballard had gone to media claiming the crew were aware that an implosion was imminent and were dropping weights. Even the Nargeolet family lawsuit makes that claim.

But Tym Catterson, an OceanGate contractor who helped launch Titan shortly before it imploded, testified under oath that he is certain that the two weights (totaling 70 pounds) were dropped to achieve neutral buoyancy and help Titan better control its movements as it neared the seabed and not as an effort to return to the surface.

The total weights were about 200 to 300 pounds combined. Dropping 70 pounds wouldn’t been enough to surface.

Plus, no texts were sent indicating trouble. James Cameron backpedaled on his earlier comments and apologized, saying he should not have passed on hearsay information about the weights on national TV and that there’s enough intentional disinformation in our world today, without adding to it with rumor mongering.

James Ballard declined to comment.

 
M
Remember how James Cameron painted a picture of the last minutes before the implosion of panicked passengers desperate to surface as warning alarms sounded? Well…

The New York Times has an interesting article about that scenario now that testimony points to the dropping of two weights, each weighing 35 pounds, in order to slow the Titan’s descent to make a smoother ride.

The article is behind a paywall so I have to paraphrase. Both Cameron and James Ballard had gone to media claiming the crew were aware that an implosion was imminent and were dropping weights. Even the Nargeolet family lawsuit makes that claim.

But Tym Catterson, an OceanGate contractor who helped launch Titan shortly before it imploded, testified under oath that he is certain that the two weights (totaling 70 pounds) were dropped to achieve neutral buoyancy and help Titan better control its movements as it neared the seabed and not as an effort to return to the surface.

The total weights were about 200 to 300 pounds combined. Dropping 70 pounds wouldn’t been enough to surface.

Plus, no texts were sent indicating trouble. James Cameron backpedaled on his earlier comments and apologized, saying he should not have passed on hearsay information about the weights on national TV and that there’s enough intentional disinformation in our world today, without adding to it with rumor mongering.

James Ballard declined to comment.

Ms. Marple. Thanks for that info. I remember Cameron making those statements and figuring that he must have gotten that information from somewhere that made him confident to make those statements. But then seeing the test messages, I thought it didn't make sense. Did Cameron have some other additional information? Since lawsuits have been filed, I think it is safe to say that Cameron and Ballard (if he also said the same) are going to get deposed to explain those statements under oath. So they are going to have to state who told them that.
 
M

Ms. Marple. Thanks for that info. I remember Cameron making those statements and figuring that he must have gotten that information from somewhere that made him confident to make those statements. But then seeing the test messages, I thought it didn't make sense. Did Cameron have some other additional information? Since lawsuits have been filed, I think it is safe to say that Cameron and Ballard (if he also said the same) are going to get deposed to explain those statements under oath. So they are going to have to state who told them that.
Cameron claimed that he spoke with unnamed “sources” in the submersibles community. Here’s what he said in June 2023:

Cameron told ABC News that he believes the Titan's hull began to crack under pressure and that its inside sensors gave the passengers a warning to that effect.

"We understand from inside the community that they had dropped their ascent weights and they were coming up, trying to manage an emergency," he said.


I think Cameron was convinced that the Real Time Hull Monitoring System sounded an alarm early enough to mobilize the crew into attempting to surface. Other experts theorized that once the hull was breached the implosion followed within milliseconds.

Titan specs from an archived Wayback Machine capture:

BTW, the specs indicate INS/USBL technology for tracking with integrated digital communication capabilities. Here’s some information on the systems:


I kinda understand how it all works but it’s better to just read directly from the companies. A little info: INS is Inertial Navigation System. USBL is Ultra Short Baseline positioning system.

S2C R is a device/acoustic modem that enables digital communication.
 
M

Ms. Marple. Thanks for that info. I remember Cameron making those statements and figuring that he must have gotten that information from somewhere that made him confident to make those statements. But then seeing the test messages, I thought it didn't make sense. Did Cameron have some other additional information? Since lawsuits have been filed, I think it is safe to say that Cameron and Ballard (if he also said the same) are going to get deposed to explain those statements under oath. So they are going to have to state who told them that.
I read the New York Times article this morning and James Cameron very admirably apologized for his words: "I should not have passed on hearsay information about the weights on national TV. We have enough intentional disinformation in our world today, without adding to it with undisciplined rumor mongering."

Unfortunately, Dr. Robert Ballard did not comment.
 
Great story he told, well worth listening to! I didn't listen to much of the first 2 minutes, but about 2:20, they asked him why he thought he had been "phased out" at the company, and he answered, "Because I embarrassed the CEO (Stockton Rush)". There began his story of how Stockton almost turned a dive to the Andrea Doria into a total catastrophe, saved only by Lockridge in the end (barely!) I listened thru to the end, hanging on every word. (I didn't listen to the rest of the video. Yet!)

Really gives you an idea of how reckless and controlling Stockton Rush was, taking unnecessary risks, jeopardizing lives of his colleagues as well as of paying customers even! I doubt those who paid to die in the final Titan dive would ever have gone on the excursion if they had known how he really was. If only they had heard Lockridge's Andrea Doria story before buying a ticket on the Titan!

ETA ha OK, I went back to finish the video and realized I had actually seen it to the very end, minus about 10s! I didn't realize that it ended just after he finished his Andrea Doria story. So it's about 2:20 to the end... oh, just watch the whole thing! ;)
What about Stockton bonking the play station controller off of Lockridge’s head, breaking it? The woman passenger had tears in her eyes while she pleaded with Stockton to give the controller to Lockridge, so in a fit of rage he threw it at his head. What a lunatic.
 
A couple of these "mission specialist" (aka passengers) have testified and they don't come off well. They seem a bit delusional about their experiences. They are enamored of Stockton Rush (even now) and pretend like they were doing some important research into the unknown, rather than just going on an adventure tour.

The one who testified yesterday compared herself to Neil Armstrong. She also said she took notes about the fish she saw and felt it would be helpful to marine biologists.

The one today even said no further regulations are necessary because the work OceanGate was doing is so important. At the same time, he thought the U.S. Coast Guard should have done even more to help post-sinking. (Basically one of those people who believes in privatizing the profits and socializing the costs.)
 
A couple of these "mission specialist" (aka passengers) have testified and they don't come off well. They seem a bit delusional about their experiences. They are enamored of Stockton Rush (even now) and pretend like they were doing some important research into the unknown, rather than just going on an adventure tour.

The one who testified yesterday compared herself to Neil Armstrong. She also said she took notes about the fish she saw and felt it would be helpful to marine biologists.

The one today even said no further regulations are necessary because the work OceanGate was doing is so important. At the same time, he thought the U.S. Coast Guard should have done even more to help post-sinking. (Basically one of those people who believes in privatizing the profits and socializing the costs.)
I guess it is because so many have demonized the adventure tourist concept that some fee compelled to make statements like this. If I had the money and an opportunity, I would love to go down to see Titan (but on something like OceanGate, but on Alvin or some legit equipment). And I wouldn't feel bad about it. I would love to see it just for my own personal reasons.
 
I guess it is because so many have demonized the adventure tourist concept that some fee compelled to make statements like this. If I had the money and an opportunity, I would love to go down to see Titan (but on something like OceanGate, but on Alvin or some legit equipment). And I wouldn't feel bad about it. I would love to see it just for my own personal reasons.

I have no issues with adventure tourism or submersible trips. Just don't pretend like you're an Apollo astronaut doing scientific exploration when you're really just a sightseer.

(To be clear, that's a general "you", it's not aimed at @PrairieWind.)
 
I guess it is because so many have demonized the adventure tourist concept that some fee compelled to make statements like this. If I had the money and an opportunity, I would love to go down to see Titan (but on something like OceanGate, but on Alvin or some legit equipment). And I wouldn't feel bad about it. I would love to see it just for my own personal reasons.
I’ve been fascinated with the space program ever since I saw Neil Armstrong walk on the moon when I was 9.

I hope that some time in the future space travel is safe and affordable.
 
Antoinella Willby, former OG contractor has been very candid.


BBC summary:

'Antonella Willby, a field roboticist who previously worked as a contractor with OceanGate, goes on to say that she felt compelled to "reach out to the board of directors" after hearing about the report of a loud bang on Titan a year before the fatal implosion.

Another OceanGate colleague told her she should be concerned about being sued if she made her complaints publicly known, so she opted to keep silent, she tells the hearing.

Asked to describe the "safety culture" at OceanGate, she replies: "I saw what I would classify as safety theatre."

She says there were "lots of people walking around with expensive safety gear". But the company was not willing to have conversations about their safety protocols, Wilby says.

Once, when she raised basic questions about safety while diving, she says she was told: "Don't worry it'll be fun. You'll have fun."

She says she decided not to go on further dives with OceanGate after feeling like her concerns were not heard.'
 
Last edited:
Antoinella Willby, former OG contractor has been very candid.


BBC summary:

'Antonella Willby, a field roboticist who previously worked as a contractor with OceanGate, goes on to say that she felt compelled to "reach out to the board of directors" after hearing about the report of a loud bang on Titan a year before the fatal implosion.

Another OceanGate colleague told her she should be concerned about being sued if she made her complaints publicly known, so she opted to keep silent, she tells the hearing.

Asked to describe the "safety culture" at OceanGate, she replies: "I saw what I would classify as safety theatre."

She says there were "lots of people walking around with expensive safety gear". But the company was not willing to have conversations about their safety protocols, Wilby says.

Once, when she raised basic questions about safety while diving, she says she was told: "Don't worry it'll be fun. You'll have fun."

She says she decided not to go on further dives with OceanGate after feeling like her concerns were not heard.'

Her testimony was devastating. She tried to get OceanGate to investigate the explosion they heard when coming up from dive 80. And she was told that she "has a bad attitude and "doesn't have an explorer mindset" and that she couldn't handle "innovation". She eventually managed to drag out of the Director of Engineering that the hull moved during that dive. But the backlash against her was so bad she asked to be sent home. Even after getting home, she tried to get in touch with the board of directors before any further dives could take place. But she was told that speaking to the board would be a violation of her NDA and she might be sued.
 
Cameron claimed that he spoke with unnamed “sources” in the submersibles community. Here’s what he said in June 2023:

Cameron told ABC News that he believes the Titan's hull began to crack under pressure and that its inside sensors gave the passengers a warning to that effect.

"We understand from inside the community that they had dropped their ascent weights and they were coming up, trying to manage an emergency," he said.


I think Cameron was convinced that the Real Time Hull Monitoring System sounded an alarm early enough to mobilize the crew into attempting to surface. Other experts theorized that once the hull was breached the implosion followed within milliseconds.

Titan specs from an archived Wayback Machine capture:

BTW, the specs indicate INS/USBL technology for tracking with integrated digital communication capabilities. Here’s some information on the systems:


I kinda understand how it all works but it’s better to just read directly from the companies. A little info: INS is Inertial Navigation System. USBL is Ultra Short Baseline positioning system.

S2C R is a device/acoustic modem that enables digital communication.
I also recall members of the submersible & ' explorers' community saying that this was the chatter in private conversations.
Re unnamed sources

Maybe somebody like Tim Catterson? See 32mins timestamp at link ' theories flying around from people who'd had no sleep '
' if it ( banging) happens more than once or consistently .. it's something that humans are doing' (magical thinking?!)



During the hearings, OG contractor Catterson - like many others who were closely involved - parroted the familiar hindsight opinion ' I'd never have dived in the sub myself, I had my doubts'
( Catterson was contractor for OG for twenty! years 2003 - 2023 and was topside the day of the disaster & involved in the search)

Bonnie Carl's testimony is also very damaging it starts around 25mins mark. ( Bonnie left OG 2018)

( IMO This channel is fairly useful just because across several episodes it gives a brief overview of key witnesses and new revelations from the hearings. Useful for anyone interested but without the time to listen to the hearing livestreams )
 
Last edited:


Hagen said he understood the Titan submersible was experimental and not certified. He said in conversations with people such as French explorer Paul Henri "P.H." Nargeolet -- one of the five people who died in the June 2023 implosion -- he understood the risk if something went wrong during a dive to the Titanic shipwreck, located 3,800 meters below sea level.

"The conversation as related to me was that there were few assets on Earth capable of getting to depth, and that if something went wrong, that, you know, we were all going to die," he said. "P.H. related that repeatedly, and that was a common conversational thread, I think, on board, was that there were limited assets. They probably could not be organized logistically and scrambled in time to save anyone if something went wrong."
 


Hagen said he understood the Titan submersible was experimental and not certified. He said in conversations with people such as French explorer Paul Henri "P.H." Nargeolet -- one of the five people who died in the June 2023 implosion -- he understood the risk if something went wrong during a dive to the Titanic shipwreck, located 3,800 meters below sea level.

"The conversation as related to me was that there were few assets on Earth capable of getting to depth, and that if something went wrong, that, you know, we were all going to die," he said. "P.H. related that repeatedly, and that was a common conversational thread, I think, on board, was that there were limited assets. They probably could not be organized logistically and scrambled in time to save anyone if something went wrong."

He's not being honest here. Perhaps not even with himself. He was castigating the Coast Guard for not doing more when the Titan was lost. If he supposedly knew that all this about lack of time and limited assets, then why was he raising such a big stink?

In fact, we know that Stockton Rush was telling potential customers the exact opposite. Here he is in a text message saying that the sub was safer than scuba diving or flying in a helicopter. He even told Jay Bloom that it was safer than crossing the street!
1727027827740.png



 
He's not being honest here. Perhaps not even with himself. He was castigating the Coast Guard for not doing more when the Titan was lost. If he supposedly knew that all this about lack of time and limited assets, then why was he raising such a big stink?

In fact, we know that Stockton Rush was telling potential customers the exact opposite. Here he is in a text message saying that the sub was safer than scuba diving or flying in a helicopter. He even told Jay Bloom that it was safer than crossing the street!
View attachment 532863



Yes @ch_13 …… concur fully. And it seems a bit disingenuous perhaps? Would think that if he supposedly fully understood as he claims, he might have realized and feared as others did that the submersible craft was lost. MOO
 
This engineer's analysis is better than most I have seen.

Also, it appears that Nissen/Stockton lied regarding essential pressure testing at the deep ocean test facility in Maryland.

Nissen claimed at the hearing that the facility wasn't 'comfortable performing the test' and the facility had ' objected.. we don't know if they wanted to do that'

OG could've tested it in Maryland had they been willing to take basic steps to remove the electronics first

At 2 mins 29 onwards

Engineer also explains OG used lower grade titanium. From Grade 5 to lesser costly Grade 3
Also covers the lies OG told for scrapping the missions after the first hull proved faulty in Bahamas ( OG claimed scrapped missions were due to supply ship being unavailable)
 
I've been listening to today's testimony.

The first witness was Guillermo Sohnlein, the co-founder who left in 2013. Mostly his testimony was a lot of self-justification and claims about the value of OceanGate's mission. Nothing of any real value.

Second was Roy Thomas, a naval engineer who works for ABS, one of the classification agencies. I was very impressed with him. He did a presentation on submersibles and went through the issues with building one with carbon fiber. He obviously knew this stuff backwards and forwards. He was able to recite all kinds of scientific details just from memory.

Third was Phil Brooks, the former OceanGate Director of Engineering. He joined OG with a degree in computer science and no previous experience in marine engineering. He was involved in building the acoustic monitoring system, but it's clear that he had no idea how to interpret the sounds, and basically relied on what Rush told him. Nor did he know anything about sub building, a stark contrast from the previous witness. He told a ridiculous story about snapping a mechanical pencil to test the viability of the carbon fiber acoustic monitoring.

I think Brooks was basically Stockton Rush's patsy. It kind of reminds me of Hannah-Gutierrez Reed, the armorer for Rust. The production team just needed someone to fill the armorer role to tick a box, and they didn't care if she was competent. Same here, with the Director of Engineering role.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
163
Guests online
2,180
Total visitors
2,343

Forum statistics

Threads
605,224
Messages
18,184,343
Members
233,275
Latest member
Crowskullsearch33
Back
Top