I think they need to sue if only to hold the city accountable. The only possible reason I can think of to NOT test rape kits is the expense. Someone needs to make it far more expensive to not test!I wonder if her family will sue?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think they need to sue if only to hold the city accountable. The only possible reason I can think of to NOT test rape kits is the expense. Someone needs to make it far more expensive to not test!I wonder if her family will sue?
Imo If the majority of rapes were happening to men, with the same incidence they happen to women, you can bet the “system” would change pretty quickly.Wow… yes, it’s violent and is bad enough on it’s own and can traumatize for a lifetime but even worse than that the violence can escalate.
You left out race and wealth. Not saying we know those to be factors but would anyone actuaally be surprised if we learn they were?Right. What we have seen here are two different extremes - how very slow the wheels can turn, and how incredibly quickly. That the rape kit from last year was processed and produced results in about a year, and the sandals were processed and produced results in about two days - making the two results of the two assaults to come back virtually simultaneously even though the crimes were committed virtually a year apart is telling. I guess in the case of the prior rape, they had a living victim and the crime was over and done, and in the Eliza case they were seeking to locate a missing woman, so time was much more critical. That's all I can think of.
The trouble with clearing a backlog is that there is no long term market for a high level of SAK testing (thankfully). But there are major backlog right now around the country and I think we should be doing much more to clear the backlog.Re: rape kit backlog
I take it rape kits are tested by private companies? I don't get why they'd let a backlog like this build up.
If I'm looking at a two year backlog of work, then I'm buying more machines and hiring more people as required.
For example, if I double the amount of test equipment I can make more money PCM that way. The capital expenditure can me amortized, and I can make 180% (example only) more money per month.
Source: was a production manager, basic monetary theory applies.
When to invest in new equipment
Thanks for posting this. The entire article is worth reading but it boils down to men in charge not believing women imo.I used to work at one of the largest diagnostic companies in the world and I have also separately, after I left the company, actively advocated my state legislature for funds for testing the backlog. There is no problem whatsoever with lab capacity -- the large reference labs have the capabilities and the required certifications and could end the backlog very quickly and at the same, or lower, cost as the state labs.
Literally the only thing lacking is for those in power to care enough to allocate the money.
This is one of the best articles on the subject: An Epidemic of Disbelief
While what you say might be true, it is not an excuse. Police should be required to promptly test ALL rape kits. They should not have the authority to choose not to for any reason.Crime laboratories have increased their capacity significantly, but they are not able to eliminate backlogs because the demand continues to exceed the increases made in capacity. Also, federal funding programs to reduce backlogs in crime laboratories are not designed to address untested evidence stored in law enforcement agencies. The issue with rape kit backlogs is little different than other forms of forensic casework backlogs. The backlog of untested rape kits is due in part to the volume of rape kits and lack of capacity for crime labs to process them, but another significant factor is that police agencies haven’t sent many of the kits for testing. For example, if the detective investigating the sexual assault doesn’t believe the case is strong enough to move forward with prosecution or if the case resolves early in the process with a plea bargain, the rape kit might never be sent for testing. Instead, the kits remained in police storage.
I predict that the DA will seek the death penalty and there will be no plea bargaining. They have a mountain of evidence.Yeah, I expect the State to seek the DP here and this lowlife will probably plead guilty for LWOP. They have enough evidence to convict him already IMO. The video showing the abduction, him cleaning out his truck, his phone pings, etc.
It makes me furious all over again.
MOO
If the victim's family did not want the DA to seek the DP I think that should be respected.And would Eliza’s family be able to veto a DP, if they were so inclined (eg perhaps it goes against their Christian beliefs?)
Or the district attorney. The MPD don't bring charges.This news about new charges is so disturbing! MPD is probably spending the weekend scrambling to figure out what to say.
No but maybe MPD didn’t present evidence to the DA.Or the district attorney. The MPD don't bring charges.
I thought they do bring charges and then the DA decides if they will proceed?Or the district attorney. The MPD don't bring charges.
Yes. I think you’re exactly right. With my case, I was a teenager and so was my attacker, and I was told to drop it because it was probably a misunderstanding and he probably thought it was consensual. I was also told it wouldn’t hold up in court because I had a “reputation” as a party girl. Less than a year later he had another victim. She was told the same.I wonder if it is because men don’t always believe that women were raped. They might tend to think sex was consensual, and now the lady is angry with the guy because he dropped her. They project own experiences, own feelings, onto these cases. I think women are more sensitive in these matters, but in general, victim-blaming and even more, victim-distrust, are prevalent in the society.
I for one don’t believe that for a second.You left out race and wealth. Not saying we know those to be factors but would anyone actuaally be surprised if we learn they were?
The offender's DNA was already in CODIS the day Eliza was abducted. They sent the shoes found at the scene for DNA testing and matched it to the offender within 18 hours. So his DNA was already in the system when he abducted Eliza.I think I get the sequencing of events but not 100% sure. I don't think there was DNA collection back when this <modsnip - derogatory nicknames/namecalling not permitted> (can't say his name) was first accused of rape when he was 14. Then a woman comes forward in 2021 and the rape kit is administered but they still don't have <modsnip - derogatory nicknames/namecalling not permitted> DNA until then. Ok, now they do. Then poor Liza is a match. Am I right on the timing of all of this horror?