I think this gives us a better idea of what happened. There is no way he allowed her to have the cell phone for any period of time. There is no doubt in my mind they traveled from Holly's house to 100 Eaton St. only minutes after the crime happened. The next dot on the map we have is a lunch box north-west of Eaton St.
What took place at Eaton St. is anybody's guess at this point. Did they switch vehicles? Did the enter the woods? Did he dispose of more evidence around there and continue driving? Etc.
I think he knew a cell phone would be traceable but didn't know to what extent. He either had the location picked out as a good place or he intentionally threw the cell phone there before heading north-west in order to have them trace it there. I was a doubter about all of the "staged evidence" talk but something is odd here. I find is suspicious that we now have two pieces of evidence found in open areas. Not a trash dumpster, not water, not buried, not in the woods, not at the scene of the crime but along two roads.
He is either more careless than we thought or things are being placed in certain areas for a specific reason. I think the cell phone is the very first thing he gets rid of and 5 miles away from her home makes sense for traceability reasons. The last thing he probably gets rid of is her lunch box. It serves no purpose to him nor is it a harm. If he has any plans of keeping her alive she can still eat the food. A purse or back pack on the other hand contains identity and tools that could be used as weapons to fight back. I'd be willing to bet a dumpster somewhere between Eaton and the lunch box contains her backpack and purse.
What took place at Eaton St. is anybody's guess at this point. Did they switch vehicles? Did the enter the woods? Did he dispose of more evidence around there and continue driving? Etc.
I think he knew a cell phone would be traceable but didn't know to what extent. He either had the location picked out as a good place or he intentionally threw the cell phone there before heading north-west in order to have them trace it there. I was a doubter about all of the "staged evidence" talk but something is odd here. I find is suspicious that we now have two pieces of evidence found in open areas. Not a trash dumpster, not water, not buried, not in the woods, not at the scene of the crime but along two roads.
He is either more careless than we thought or things are being placed in certain areas for a specific reason. I think the cell phone is the very first thing he gets rid of and 5 miles away from her home makes sense for traceability reasons. The last thing he probably gets rid of is her lunch box. It serves no purpose to him nor is it a harm. If he has any plans of keeping her alive she can still eat the food. A purse or back pack on the other hand contains identity and tools that could be used as weapons to fight back. I'd be willing to bet a dumpster somewhere between Eaton and the lunch box contains her backpack and purse.