MassGuy
The Monsters Aren’t The Ones Beneath The Bed
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2018
- Messages
- 25,749
- Reaction score
- 607,329
The shirt was mentioned because it was an identifier. You had his height, the watch, and the shirt. The 911 caller who found him also mentioned the shirt.Did either autopsy say the body condition was consistent with being in the water 2 weeks?
It’s going to take a for me while to accept no water in the lungs as perfectly normal for drowning. Let’s remember that the next time a wife or child is found in the tub, said to have accidentally drowned, but no water in their lungs.
The other thing that bothers me is that when Riley was found the very first thing they said was he was wearing his shirt! Did any of us suspect for a moment that he would not have boots or pants? They specifically mentioned the shirt, made sure it was clear he had it on, but no mention of his bottom half. And that is because there was a rumor that a person was spotted possibly wearing his shirt. So that seems to me to be a way for them to say, ‘see everything is fine no one took his shirt. The end’. That is a big omission IMO.
He did fall and hit his head, anything said about head injury?
Both autopsies had the exact same result, with no signs of trauma.