Actually, if you read what it says, it DOESN'T exclude her. All it says is that they couldn't match her to it with the evidence that was presented to them at the time. (That's leaving aside the question as to how much actual analysis the examiner in question did, a question which was raised
by one of his own colleagues, I'll thank you to remember.)
I'm not so sure about that. There are a lot of conflicting stories.
Not just "a couple," friend. Some of the best in the world.
Just how many make up a consensus, anyway? Three? Four? Is there a minimum? You keep using that word, "consensus." I do not think it means what you think it means.
Are you so certain of that? Pete Hofstrom even said, "
so what if she wrote the note? It doesn't prove she killed her kid."
And he was a member of the DA's office!
And from a
legal standpoint,
he's right! All it proves is that she wrote it.
I don't know about that, HOTYH. I always thought it was a question of quality, not quantity.
Let me put it another way. Which would you rather have: a consensus of pop-guns, or one or two howitzers? Because that's how it stacks up as I see it!
Actually, I've got a real treat for everybody here. Why don't we hear from one of them? Here you are:
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/TalkForensics/2009/09/13/Cina-Wong-Forensic-Document-Examiner