Toddler's Mother/Peaches/Jane Doe #3

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
The bracelets were common in the 80s. At least in NY.
At the risk of beating this dead horse again... it seems to me that it's common flea market jewelry from the 80's or 90's. Very common on long Island.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
 
Yeah, wrapping in a blanket = remorse and usually points to a parent. I never considered that in this case.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Exactly. I mean why not dismember the kid and toss it in a bag like the others unless it's either special or he didn't want to kill it and maybe has a kid and is remorseful over that.
 
Exactly. I mean why not dismember the kid and toss it in a bag like the others unless it's either special or he didn't want to kill it and maybe has a kid and is remorseful over that.





After the TV show America’s Most Wanted aired a photo of Peaches’ tattoo, Connecticut tattoo artist Steve Cullen contacted authorities. Cullen said he thinks he did the tattoo, and that he gave it to a young woman from Long Island who said she was having problems with a boyfriend. Cullen said he recognized the ink immediately because, “I’ve been tattooing for 30 years, not once have I ever seen a peach with a bite taken out of it.” from Crimefeed
 
Took it a bit further and it could mean tB8. What does it mean? The tattoo was located on her left breast, add to it "boy trouble" (according to Tattoo artist), a bite taken out of the heart shaped peach and it could have a sexual meaning like:

attachment.php
attachment.php

tB8 = TO BE ATE (TO BE EATEN) A piece of her peaches was just bitten off.. Someone just took a bite.. She is being "eaten", sexually?

-Nin
:bump: You guys are doing great work. :cupcake:Cupcakes for everyone!

Let's see if we can get a positive ID on that tattoo and those initials, in particular. Could be a key to more info.

:tyou:
 
:bump: You guys are doing great work. :cupcake:Cupcakes for everyone!

Let's see if we can get a positive ID on that tattoo and those initials, in particular. Could be a key to more info.

:tyou:

To be honest Bessie, I believe the initials people are seeing in the peach tattoo is pareidolia. I don't believe there are any initials inserted into the leaf, especially seeing that this tattoo is so small in size. I'm not an expert by any means, but I do have experience developing crime scene photos for law enforcement.
 
I see TBB or TBx something....it may be the Artists Initials as in paintings?? So Maybe that Guy Steve Cullen ( tattoo artist in CT ) was mistaken he did the tattoo for a young Woman fr LI ....
 
The reason why DNA update of Peaches and toddler was uploaded into system only now:

From yesterday Long Island news - 20 Dec 16 - Long Island Coroners Seek ID for 38 Unidentified Human Remains

Under a recently enacted New York State law, medical examiners are now required to list descriptions of such remains in the National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs), a federal database designed to help identify John and Jane Does.
In June of this year, state lawmakers passed legislation requiring medical examiners statewide to upload data on unidentified dead people into NamUs, the governor signed the bill into law a month later and it took effect in September (2016).
County medical examiners in New York State are required to upload dental records, fingerprints, photos and other physical details they have to describe unidentified people who died
https://www.longislandpress.com/201...rs-seek-id-for-38-unidentified-human-remains/
 
attachment.php


attachment.php


-Nin
 

Attachments

  • peach tattoo original work result1.jpg
    peach tattoo original work result1.jpg
    35.8 KB · Views: 1,386
  • peach tattoo original work result1a.jpg
    peach tattoo original work result1a.jpg
    30.7 KB · Views: 1,325
I'm more leaning towards the baby just didn't fit the agenda. The baby was just a unwanted, thing to dispose of without pleasure or remorse just to achieve his ultimate goal. The baby doesn't fit into the ritual or any kind of staging or compulsive behavior so it was just an obstacle. The baby wasn't' despised of the same because it didn't get him off like the ritual that drives him to kill the others and he likely only killed the baby because it would have died either way if left there and couldn't take the chance to leave it anywhere so it was a self preservation/obstacle/afterthought kill. Although this could have presented a opportunity to have control early and more control they he'd ever had which allowed him to use the child to his advantage and that was likely thrilling and he maybe hated to lose that. He would have had total control without anything but a mere hint of a threat. I think for these reasons this was a special encounter to him. I think If he's able to control his desires to keep trinkets and evidence to relive the event. This one maybe different. I also think he's organized I believe he lives some distance from the crimes, nothing extreme but not close 15-25 miles. If he was disorganized hed want to keep them close to himself. It would be an irrational attempt to control the outcome of the discovery and inability to fight compulsion to be near. I think these could be different. I think it is or could be possible the locations are either closer to him because he couldn't resists or have more significance to him. Maybe something specifically before the murders started a car accident perhaps or a place his car broke down and he felt out of control and vulnerable. It would be wise to look into police collision reports from that area and perhaps abandoned vehicles overnight, tickets of those sorts. Possibly death of a love one there.
Just one mans mind at work.
 
Just wanted to say "hello". I am new to posting but not new to the forum.

Does anyone recall the pig charm/necklace? Now that the body parts found in two different locations have been linked, was there any jewelry found with the other set of remains? I ask because the pig is a symbol in the Chinese zodiac. Which brings me back to the peaches tattoo. The bitten peach is linked to back to Chinese history including a prostitue and homosexuality.

Forgive me if this has been mentioned but thought I'd ask since those remains were recently linked. I don't recall which set had been found with the necklace/pig charm.
 
I'm more leaning towards the baby just didn't fit the agenda. The baby was just a unwanted, thing to dispose of without pleasure or remorse just to achieve his ultimate goal. The baby doesn't fit into the ritual or any kind of staging or compulsive behavior so it was just an obstacle. The baby wasn't' despised of the same because it didn't get him off like the ritual that drives him to kill the others and he likely only killed the baby because it would have died either way if left there and couldn't take the chance to leave it anywhere so it was a self preservation/obstacle/afterthought kill. Although this could have presented a opportunity to have control early and more control they he'd ever had which allowed him to use the child to his advantage and that was likely thrilling and he maybe hated to lose that. He would have had total control without anything but a mere hint of a threat. I think for these reasons this was a special encounter to him. I think If he's able to control his desires to keep trinkets and evidence to relive the event. This one maybe different. I also think he's organized I believe he lives some distance from the crimes, nothing extreme but not close 15-25 miles. If he was disorganized hed want to keep them close to himself. It would be an irrational attempt to control the outcome of the discovery and inability to fight compulsion to be near. I think these could be different. I think it is or could be possible the locations are either closer to him because he couldn't resists or have more significance to him. Maybe something specifically before the murders started a car accident perhaps or a place his car broke down and he felt out of control and vulnerable. It would be wise to look into police collision reports from that area and perhaps abandoned vehicles overnight, tickets of those sorts. Possibly death of a love one there.
Just one mans mind at work.
I sense that the killer may have been involved in or has seen some kind of horrific accident.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
 
To cause the death of an innocent child surely reserves a special place in hell for this killer. A place where dark energy moves slow as molasses with like kind.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
 
Reading that the Tattoo Artist said she was from the Bronx, and on a wild (maybe goose chase) I typed Peaches, and Bronx into google.
a couple of interesting results popped up.

PEACHES STRIP CLUB in the Bronx
BRONX PEACHES ESCORT SERVICE (backpage)
both results are difficult to follow to a actual brick and mortar building
 
Just wanted to say "hello". I am new to posting but not new to the forum.

Does anyone recall the pig charm/necklace? Now that the body parts found in two different locations have been linked, was there any jewelry found with the other set of remains? I ask because the pig is a symbol in the Chinese zodiac. Which brings me back to the peaches tattoo. The bitten peach is linked to back to Chinese history including a prostitue and homosexuality.

Forgive me if this has been mentioned but thought I'd ask since those remains were recently linked. I don't recall which set had been found with the necklace/pig charm.
There was an Asian woman found dead on the North Shore in Lattington. She was found with the pig pendant. Shes also UID.
 
There are literally so many why's in this case? This is just another one of them. I think its just all part of a coverup and they weren't ever going to release information if they didn't have to. Just like in the AC4 murders.

Anyone else sick to their stomach? [emoji55]


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Josh was just on Foxnews. He said both the NCPD and SCPD knew for over a year that the remains found in Hempstead and Gilgo were connected. Why did they wait over a year to let the public know?
Technically they are telling the truth.. Does that mean they found out just over a year ago? I dont believe that. Go with what we already know. The ME told fieldnotes that LE wont sign off on putting the toddlers mom in NAMUS. Why? Because theres something in her profile they do not want out there. We now know why.
 
Did the tattoo artist say that he drew initials in the tattoo? (If this is already answered, I missed it.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
97
Guests online
2,314
Total visitors
2,411

Forum statistics

Threads
602,015
Messages
18,133,286
Members
231,206
Latest member
Mbennett90
Back
Top