policyoftruth501
Member
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2017
- Messages
- 709
- Reaction score
- 105
This is my personal opinion based on my experience from studying psychology in college with an emphasis on abnormal psychology. I honestly believe there are two killers. It doesn't make sense to have one killer that both preserves the victims by wrapping them up and at the same time slaughters other victims. One killer enjoys having trophies of his accomplishments and the other thinks nothing of his victims. They are strictly there for his pleasure and his pleasure happens to be mutilation. Then he throws them away like trash, because that's what they are to him. Serial killers, at least none that I've studied, both mutilate some victims and preserve others.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I stand corrected on my comment on serial killers. There have been two significant instances involving 3 serial killers where the method of death varied greatly. One was H.H. Holmes back in the late 1880's to early 1890's in Chicago (although he had killed in other locations, the vast majority of his killings were in Chicago). The other killers were Leonard Lake and Charles Ng who killed as a pair in Northern California from 1983-1985. All three enjoyed torturing their victims and they all three killed for profit too. Of course the theory of a serial killer pair, each with their own signature, could very well be a possibility in Long Island.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk