debbie0604
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2008
- Messages
- 924
- Reaction score
- 1
My thoughts on the tools and weapon expert has to do with the type of tool used to cut the duct tape, and perhaps other clothing was cut (not sure). The weapon expert could be called for the household weapons search online, and what kind of weapons could have been used for murder. The vet (which will probably include a wildlife expert as well) could be called for the different animals in the woods - snake, squirrels, fish, and the other different animals (that I hate to think about) that disarticulated the remains. The SA will need the testimony of these experts to describe the trauma to the bones as opposed to if it could be due to a household weapon. If they are describing a specific household weapon, the SA will need that experts testimony as to whether or not that weapon would create "soft tissue injury" substantial enough to cause death that now is not evident due to the nature of decomposition.
Also, the clothing in the bag can contain other items that could contain yorkie hair (I had a yorkie for 15 years and he shed hair).
Also, the clothing in the bag can contain other items that could contain yorkie hair (I had a yorkie for 15 years and he shed hair).